Suppr超能文献

长期护理机构中的结核病监测措施

Tuberculosis surveillance practices in long-term care institutions.

作者信息

Naglie G, McArthur M, Simor A, Naus M, Cheung A, McGeer A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Toronto Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995 Mar;16(3):148-51. doi: 10.1086/647076.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the tuberculosis (TB) skin-testing practices of long-term care facilities for the elderly in Toronto, Ontario.

DESIGN

A telephone survey using a 25-item questionnaire.

SETTING

Twenty-nine nursing homes (NHs) and 26 Homes for the Aged (HFAs) in metropolitan Toronto.

RESULTS

Thirty-one percent of facilities (17 of 55) had no formal tuberculin skin-testing program, including 52% of NHs (15 of 29) versus 8% of HFAs (2 of 26; P = 0.001). Ninety-two percent of HFAs (24 of 26), compared with 45% of NHs (13 of 29), obtained preadmission or admission skin-test status of residents (P = 0.0005). Annual testing was performed at 46% of HFAs (12 of 26) and 27% of NHs (8 of 29; P = 0.28). Of facilities that carried out any skin testing, 64% of HFAs (16 of 25) versus 32% of NHs (6 of 19) measured induration to establish test positivity (P = 0.068). Fifty-two percent of HFAs (13 of 25), compared with 21% of NHs (4 of 19), recorded the actual size of induration in the patient record (P = 0.085). Only 28% of HFAs (7 of 25) and 21% of NHs (4 of 19) correctly defined a positive tuberculin skin test.

CONCLUSIONS

TB surveillance practices in long-term care institutions in Toronto are inadequate and often yield results that do not predict the risk of infection and cannot be used to investigate outbreaks. Tuberculin skin-testing practices were better at HFAs, which are subject to provincial legislation regarding TB surveillance, than at NHs, which are not subject to this legislation. Staff at HFAs and NHs require education regarding tuberculin skin-testing policies and procedures.

摘要

目的

确定安大略省多伦多市老年长期护理机构的结核菌素皮肤试验做法。

设计

使用一份包含25个条目的问卷进行电话调查。

地点

大多伦多地区的29家养老院(NHs)和26家老年之家(HFAs)。

结果

31%的机构(55家中的17家)没有正式的结核菌素皮肤试验项目,其中52%的养老院(29家中的15家)与8%的老年之家(26家中的2家;P = 0.001)。92%的老年之家(26家中的24家),相比45%的养老院(29家中的13家),获取了居民入院前或入院时的皮肤试验状态(P = 0.0005)。46%的老年之家(26家中的12家)和27%的养老院(29家中的8家)进行年度检测(P = 0.28)。在进行任何皮肤试验的机构中,64%的老年之家(25家中的16家)与32%的养老院(19家中的6家)测量硬结以确定试验阳性(P = 0.068)。52%的老年之家(25家中的13家),相比21%的养老院(19家中的4家),在患者记录中记录了硬结的实际大小(P = 0.085)。只有28%的老年之家(25家中的7家)和21%的养老院(19家中的4家)正确定义了结核菌素皮肤试验阳性。

结论

多伦多长期护理机构的结核病监测做法不充分,且往往得出的结果无法预测感染风险,也不能用于调查疫情爆发。在受省级结核病监测立法约束的老年之家,结核菌素皮肤试验做法比不受该立法约束的养老院更好。老年之家和养老院的工作人员需要接受关于结核菌素皮肤试验政策和程序的教育。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验