Suppr超能文献

一项比较拉西地平与硝苯地平缓释片治疗高血压患者的长期研究:安全性数据。

A long-term study comparing lacidipine and nifedipine SR in hypertensive patients: safety data.

作者信息

Leonetti G, Salvi S

机构信息

Istituto di Clinica Medica, University of Milan, Ospedale Maggiore, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;23 Suppl 5:S108-10. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199423005-00024.

Abstract

The clinical safety of lacidipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, has been assessed in a long-term, comparative study in hypertensive patients. Slow-release (SR) nifedipine was used for comparison. The type and incidence of adverse events seen with both drugs are characteristic of the dihydropyridine class of drugs and were mainly due to pharmacologically induced vasodilation, but lacidipine caused a significantly lower incidence of ankle edema than nifedipine SR. There were no unexpected adverse events during the treatment. The addition of atenolol 50 mg once daily did not increase the frequency of adverse events. Therefore, lacidipine can be considered a safe antihypertensive drug, which can be used as a suitable agent for first-line treatment of hypertension.

摘要

在一项针对高血压患者的长期对照研究中,对新型二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂拉西地平的临床安全性进行了评估。使用缓释硝苯地平作为对照。两种药物出现的不良事件类型和发生率均为二氢吡啶类药物所特有,主要是由药理作用引起的血管舒张所致,但拉西地平引起的踝部水肿发生率明显低于缓释硝苯地平。治疗期间未出现意外不良事件。每日一次加用50mg阿替洛尔并未增加不良事件的发生频率。因此,拉西地平可被视为一种安全的抗高血压药物,可作为高血压一线治疗的适宜药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验