Chen S A, Wu T J, Chiang C E, Tai C T, Chiou C W, Ueng K C, Lee S H, Cheng C C, Wen Z C, Chang M S
Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jul 15;76(3):131-7.
Recurrence rate of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia after successful radiofrequency ablation varies widely, and the determinants of recurrent AV nodal reentrant tachycardia remain controversial. Furthermore, true or pseudorecurrence of tachycardia after successful ablation in patients with different forms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia has not been evaluated systematically. Three hundred sixty-two patients (161 men and 201 women [mean age 52 +/- 16 years]), including 314 patients with typical-form, 10 patients with atypical-form, 4 patients with variant-form, and 34 patients with multiple-form AV nodal reentrant tachycardias, received selective radiofrequency ablation of the anterograde and/or retrograde slow AV nodal pathway. During a mean follow-up of 27 +/- 11 months, 9 patients (2.5%) experienced recurrent AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (true recurrence, group A), and 8 (2.2%) had inappropriate sinus tachycardia or paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias (pseudorecurrence, group B). Neither the true nor pseudorecurrence rate was different among the 4 different forms of tachycardia. Factors including presence of residual slow pathway conduction, a single AV nodal reentrant echo beat, absence of an accelerated junctional rhythm during successful ablation, facilitating induction of tachycardia by isoproterenol, radiofrequency pulse number, and successful ablation site were not associated with an increased risk of recurrent AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The onset time of recurrent tachycardia was significantly late in group B patients (30 +/- 21 vs 292 +/- 240 days, p = 0.04). Thus, this study demonstrated that both true and pseudorecurrence could occur after successful ablation.
房室结折返性心动过速成功行射频消融术后的复发率差异很大,而复发性房室结折返性心动过速的决定因素仍存在争议。此外,不同类型房室结折返性心动过速患者成功消融术后心动过速的真性或假性复发尚未得到系统评估。362例患者(161例男性和201例女性[平均年龄52±16岁]),包括314例典型型、10例非典型型、4例变异型和34例多型房室结折返性心动过速患者,接受了房室结前向和/或逆向慢径路的选择性射频消融。在平均27±11个月的随访期间,9例患者(2.5%)发生了复发性房室结折返性心动过速(真性复发,A组),8例患者(2.2%)出现了不适当窦性心动过速或阵发性房性快速心律失常(假性复发,B组)。4种不同类型的心动过速之间的真性和假性复发率均无差异。包括残留慢径路传导、单个房室结折返性回波搏动、成功消融期间无加速性交界性心律、异丙肾上腺素易诱发心动过速、射频脉冲次数和成功消融部位等因素与复发性房室结折返性心动过速风险增加无关。B组患者复发性心动过速的发作时间明显较晚(30±21天对292±240天,p=0.04)。因此,本研究表明成功消融后真性和假性复发均可能发生。