Cook D L, Weaver D L
Department of Pathology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington 05405-0068, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Jul;104(1):17-22. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/104.1.17.
Medullary carcinoma (MC) of the breast has been regarded as a subtype of breast carcinoma with a relatively favorable prognosis despite its high nuclear grade and high mitotic index. High nuclear grade and high mitotic index have been correlated with DNA aneuploidy and high S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry. Generally in breast cancer, these histologic and DNA content features predict a less favorable prognosis. To address this paradox, all cases of MC of the breast (20 of 1,365 carcinomas [1.5%]) diagnosed between 1968 and 1982 were compared to age- and stage-matched cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) diagnosed during the same time period. All of the MC and 80% of the IDC had one or more DNA aneuploid stem lines. Average total SPF was 8.1% for MC and 4.8% for IDC. DNA analysis was performed from paraffin blocks (average CV: 4.5% DNA diploid; 4.1% DNA aneuploid), and subjected to computer modeled analysis. Statistically significant differences between presence or absence of DNA aneuploidy (P = .035) and total SPF (P = .029) were demonstrated between the two groups. Thirteen of 20 patients (65%) with MC (average followup 130 months) were alive at the end of the study period compared to 12 of 20 patients (60%) with IDC (average follow-up 160 months). The difference in crude survival was not statistically significant (P = .867). However, there was a tendency toward early death in MC and late death in IDC. Within the TNM stage-matched patients, no significant difference was demonstrated for tumor size or nodal status when these variables were examined separately. In conclusion, statistically significant differences in DNA content and proliferative fraction exist between medullary carcinoma of the breast and ductal carcinoma. The biologic and clinical differences demonstrated in this analysis warrant careful consideration before including cases of medullary carcinoma in studies evaluating newer prognostic variables in breast cancer.
乳腺髓样癌尽管核分级高且有丝分裂指数高,但一直被视为预后相对较好的乳腺癌亚型。通过流式细胞术,高核分级和高有丝分裂指数与DNA非整倍体及高S期分数(SPF)相关。一般在乳腺癌中,这些组织学和DNA含量特征预示着预后较差。为了解决这一矛盾,将1968年至1982年间诊断的所有乳腺髓样癌病例(1365例癌中的20例[1.5%])与同期诊断的年龄和分期匹配的浸润性导管癌(IDC)病例进行比较。所有髓样癌和80%的浸润性导管癌有一个或多个DNA非整倍体干细胞系。髓样癌的平均总SPF为8.1%,浸润性导管癌为4.8%。从石蜡块进行DNA分析(平均变异系数:DNA二倍体为4.5%;DNA非整倍体为4.1%),并进行计算机模拟分析。两组之间在有无DNA非整倍体(P = .035)和总SPF(P = .029)方面显示出统计学上的显著差异。研究期末,20例髓样癌患者中有13例(65%)存活(平均随访130个月),而20例浸润性导管癌患者中有12例(60%)存活(平均随访160个月)。粗生存率的差异无统计学意义(P = .867)。然而,髓样癌有早期死亡倾向,浸润性导管癌有晚期死亡倾向。在TNM分期匹配的患者中,分别检查这些变量时,肿瘤大小或淋巴结状态无显著差异。总之,乳腺髓样癌和导管癌在DNA含量和增殖分数方面存在统计学上的显著差异。在将髓样癌病例纳入评估乳腺癌新预后变量的研究之前,本分析中显示的生物学和临床差异值得仔细考虑。