Kilka H G, Geiger P, Mehrkens H H
Abteilung für Anaesthesiologie, Rehabilitationskrankenhaus Ulm.
Anaesthesist. 1995 May;44(5):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s001010050162.
Patchy analgesia and incomplete motor blockade sometimes occur during surgery of the upper limb under axillary brachial plexus blockade. To avoid these problems, we sought an alternative approach to the brachial plexus to guarantee reliable anaesthesia. Based on anatomic studies, we undertook a prospective clinical study with 175 patients. METHODS. One hundred seventy-five patients undergoing surgery of the upper limb were anaesthetised using the new technique, based on the results of the anatomic study. We divided the distance between the fossa jugularis and the ventral process of the acromium into two equal parts. An exactly vertical puncture was made using an electrical stimulation cannula and nerve stimulator set at 1.0 mA until muscle contractions were noted in the area to be operated. The current was then progressively reduced to at least 0.3 mA; 400 mg Prilocaine 1% and 50 mg bupivacaine 0.5% were applied in a single injection. RESULTS. Operability was achieved in 94.8% of patients within an average time of 13.5 min after injection (minimum 5 min, maximum 30 min). The tourniquet was tolerated in all cases. For sedation or analgesia, 32.5% required no drugs, 57.1% received low doses of hypnotics (< 5 mg midazolam) as desired, and 5.2% required systemic analgesia due to patchy anaesthesia. In 5.2% of cases the block was insufficient and general anaesthesia was administered. Except in these cases, complete blockades were found after surgery. Postoperative analgesia lasted for 3 to 20 h with an average of 8 h. All patients were satisfied with the anaesthesia and would choose this method another time. Venous puncture occurred in 18 cases without significant problems. In 12 cases we observed Horner's syndrome. No arterial or pleural injury was observed. CONCLUSIONS. Infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus blockade represents a highly successful method compared to other common techniques. Tolerance of the upper arm tourniquet for even longer periods also demonstrates the effective anaesthesia. Other important advantages include a very rapid onset of complete neural blockade and long-lasting postoperative analgesia. The method had low risks and high acceptance by both patients and anaesthesists.
在腋路臂丛神经阻滞下进行上肢手术时,有时会出现局部镇痛和运动阻滞不完全的情况。为避免这些问题,我们寻求一种替代的臂丛神经阻滞方法以确保可靠的麻醉效果。基于解剖学研究,我们对175例患者进行了一项前瞻性临床研究。方法:根据解剖学研究结果,对175例接受上肢手术的患者采用新技术进行麻醉。我们将胸锁乳突肌锁骨头、胸小肌和锁骨所形成的锁骨下三角分为两等份。使用电刺激套管针和神经刺激器(设置为1.0 mA)进行垂直穿刺,直到在手术区域观察到肌肉收缩。然后将电流逐渐降低至至少0.3 mA;单次注射1%丙胺卡因400 mg和0.5%布比卡因50 mg。结果:94.8%的患者在注射后平均13.5分钟内(最短5分钟,最长30分钟)达到可手术状态。所有病例均能耐受止血带。对于镇静或镇痛,32.5%的患者无需用药,57.1%的患者按需接受低剂量催眠药(<5 mg咪达唑仑),5.2%的患者因局部麻醉不全需要全身镇痛。5.2%的病例阻滞效果不佳,改行全身麻醉。除这些病例外,术后均发现阻滞完全。术后镇痛持续3至20小时,平均8小时。所有患者对麻醉效果满意,愿意再次选择该方法。18例发生静脉穿刺,无明显问题。12例观察到霍纳综合征。未观察到动脉或胸膜损伤。结论:与其他常用技术相比,锁骨下垂直臂丛神经阻滞是一种非常成功的方法。上臂止血带的耐受性良好,甚至可持续更长时间,也证明了麻醉效果良好。其他重要优点包括完全神经阻滞起效非常迅速和术后镇痛持续时间长。该方法风险低,患者和麻醉医生的接受度高。