• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[晚期前列腺癌患者的激素与化疗联合治疗]

[Combined hormone and chemotherapy for the patients with advanced prostate cancer].

作者信息

Uekado Y, Hirano A, Inagaki T, Hiroi A, Watanabe T

机构信息

Dept. of Urology, Wakayama Medical College.

出版信息

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1995 Jul;22(8):1041-5.

PMID:7611755
Abstract

From November 1984 to December 1993, 72 patients with newly diagnosed, stage C or D prostate cancer were treated with chemohormonal therapy consisting of CDDP, CPM, diethylstilbestrol diphosphate and orchiectomy. Forty-four of 72 patients (61%) had partial response 3 months after the initiation of the treatment. A good response rate was observed in prostate gland and tumor markers (63% and 81%), but the response rate was poor in bone and other soft tissure metastasis (17% and 18%). Subjective symptoms improved in 82% of the pain, 70% of the infravesical obstruction, 65% of the performance status, and 5% of the body weight. The 5-year survival rate was 66%. The prognosis of the patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma or high Gleason score tumor was poor. Survival rate was no different between stage C and D. Relapse occurred in 16 patients (22%) and tended to occur in the patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma, high Gleason score tumor, stage D2 or stable disease. The survival rate was better, and the relapse rate lower than in the 35 patients with hormonal treatment alone during the same period, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups.

摘要

1984年11月至1993年12月,72例新诊断的C期或D期前列腺癌患者接受了由顺铂、环磷酰胺、己烯雌酚二磷酸酯和睾丸切除术组成的化学激素治疗。72例患者中有44例(61%)在治疗开始3个月后出现部分缓解。前列腺和肿瘤标志物的缓解率良好(分别为63%和81%),但骨和其他软组织转移的缓解率较差(分别为17%和18%)。82%的疼痛、70%的膀胱颈以下梗阻、65%的体能状态和5%的体重的主观症状有所改善。5年生存率为66%。低分化癌或高Gleason评分肿瘤患者的预后较差。C期和D期患者的生存率无差异。16例患者(22%)出现复发,且低分化癌、高Gleason评分肿瘤、D2期或病情稳定的患者更容易复发。生存率高于同期仅接受激素治疗的35例患者,复发率低于这些患者,但两组之间未观察到显著差异。

相似文献

1
[Combined hormone and chemotherapy for the patients with advanced prostate cancer].[晚期前列腺癌患者的激素与化疗联合治疗]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1995 Jul;22(8):1041-5.
2
[Treatment results of combined hormone and chemotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer].
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1991 Aug;37(8):825-31.
3
Hormone chemotherapy for newly diagnosed patients with metastatic prostate cancer.激素化疗用于新诊断的转移性前列腺癌患者。
Int Urol Nephrol. 1993;25(5):469-74.
4
[Clinical evaluation of chemohormonal therapy as an initial treatment for stage D2 prostatic cancer--effect of UFT administration combined with hormonal therapy].[以化学激素疗法作为D2期前列腺癌初始治疗的临床评估——优福定联合激素疗法的疗效]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1995 Jan;22(1):105-9.
5
[Combination therapy with hormonal, radiation and chemotherapy for stage C prostate cancer].
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1996 Nov;42(11):869-74.
6
[Effect of UFT on treatment of urological cancer--effect of UFT on treatment of invasive bladder cancer and advanced prostate cancer. Ibaraki Urological Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group].[优福定对泌尿生殖系统癌症的治疗效果——优福定对浸润性膀胱癌和晚期前列腺癌的治疗效果。茨城县泌尿生殖系统癌症化疗研究组]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998 Jul;25(8):1179-87.
7
[Combination therapy with estrogen and UFT in newly diagnosed prostatic cancer (poorly differentiated, stage D2)].雌激素与优福定联合治疗新诊断前列腺癌(低分化,D2期)
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1996 Mar;42(3):201-6.
8
Successful treatment of poor prognostic patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma with the association of diethylstilbestrol and cyclophosphamide.己烯雌酚与环磷酰胺联合治疗晚期前列腺癌预后不良患者取得成功。
Rev Esp Oncol. 1982;29(2):317-24.
9
[Hormonal treatment of carcinoma of the prostate].
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1991 Aug;37(8):809-16.
10
Randomized comparison of total androgen blockade alone versus combined with weekly epirubicin in advanced prostate cancer.晚期前列腺癌中单纯全雄激素阻断与联合每周表柔比星治疗的随机对照研究
Eur Urol. 1997;32 Suppl 3:81-5.