Charlo Dupont T, Fernández Martín M, Tejido Sánchez C
Departamento de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1995 Jun;87(6):449-52.
The aim of this study was to compare the cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with that of open cholecystectomy.
We analyzed the cost of both procedures regarding hospital stay, days of work lost and the cost derived from the morbidity of the complications of each technique in two groups of patients. With these data we were able to calculate direct and indirect costs of both procedures and compare them.
Morbidity was similar in both groups and had no influence in the cost; cost of the material used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was higher; hospital stay and days of lost work were significantly lower for the laparoscopic procedure than for the open one. The total cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 23% cheaper than that of open cholecystectomy.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be cheaper than open cholecystectomy. As the laparoscopic technique becomes more widespread its cost might decrease even further.
本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术的成本。
我们分析了两组患者在住院时间、误工天数以及每种技术并发症的发病率所产生的成本。利用这些数据,我们能够计算出两种手术的直接和间接成本并进行比较。
两组的发病率相似,且对成本没有影响;腹腔镜胆囊切除术所用材料的成本更高;腹腔镜手术的住院时间和误工天数明显低于开腹手术。腹腔镜胆囊切除术的总成本比开腹胆囊切除术便宜23%。
腹腔镜胆囊切除术似乎比开腹胆囊切除术更便宜。随着腹腔镜技术的更广泛应用,其成本可能会进一步降低。