Baker R, Robertson N, Farooqi A
Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital.
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):31-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.31.
To identify the factors influencing participation in a single topic audit initiated by a medical audit advisory group.
Interview and questionnaire survey of general practitioners who had been invited to take part in an audit of vitamin B-12.
All 147 general practices in Leicestershire.
Aspects of structure, attitude, and behaviour that influenced participation or non-participation.
75 practices completed the audit, 49 withdrew after initial agreement, and 23 refused to take part at the outset. Participants were more likely than those who refused to view the advisory group as useful or a threat and to have positive thoughts about audit but less likely to have previously undertaken audit entailing implementation of change. Participants were more likely than those who withdrew to have positive thoughts about audit and to have discussed whether to take part within the practice but were less likely to view the advisory group as useful. The most common reason given for withdrawal was lack of time.
Participation was influenced by attitudes towards audit in general and the advisory group in particular and by aspects of behaviour such as communication within the practice. Practical support and resources may help some practices undertake audit, but advisory groups must also deal with attitudes and unsatisfactory communication in practice teams.
确定影响参与医学审计咨询小组发起的单一主题审计的因素。
对受邀参与维生素B-12审计的全科医生进行访谈和问卷调查。
莱斯特郡的所有147家全科诊所。
影响参与或不参与的结构、态度和行为方面。
75家诊所完成了审计,49家在初步同意后退出,23家一开始就拒绝参与。与拒绝参与的诊所相比,参与的诊所更有可能认为咨询小组有用或构成威胁,对审计有积极看法,但此前进行涉及实施变革的审计的可能性较小。与退出的诊所相比,参与的诊所更有可能对审计有积极看法,并在诊所内部讨论过是否参与,但认为咨询小组有用的可能性较小。退出的最常见原因是时间不足。
参与受到对审计总体尤其是对咨询小组的态度以及诊所内部沟通等行为方面的影响。实际支持和资源可能有助于一些诊所进行审计,但咨询小组还必须处理实践团队中的态度和沟通不畅问题。