Suppr超能文献

全科医疗中的审计:影响参与的因素

Audit in general practice: factors influencing participation.

作者信息

Baker R, Robertson N, Farooqi A

机构信息

Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):31-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors influencing participation in a single topic audit initiated by a medical audit advisory group.

DESIGN

Interview and questionnaire survey of general practitioners who had been invited to take part in an audit of vitamin B-12.

SETTING

All 147 general practices in Leicestershire.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Aspects of structure, attitude, and behaviour that influenced participation or non-participation.

RESULTS

75 practices completed the audit, 49 withdrew after initial agreement, and 23 refused to take part at the outset. Participants were more likely than those who refused to view the advisory group as useful or a threat and to have positive thoughts about audit but less likely to have previously undertaken audit entailing implementation of change. Participants were more likely than those who withdrew to have positive thoughts about audit and to have discussed whether to take part within the practice but were less likely to view the advisory group as useful. The most common reason given for withdrawal was lack of time.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation was influenced by attitudes towards audit in general and the advisory group in particular and by aspects of behaviour such as communication within the practice. Practical support and resources may help some practices undertake audit, but advisory groups must also deal with attitudes and unsatisfactory communication in practice teams.

摘要

目的

确定影响参与医学审计咨询小组发起的单一主题审计的因素。

设计

对受邀参与维生素B-12审计的全科医生进行访谈和问卷调查。

地点

莱斯特郡的所有147家全科诊所。

主要观察指标

影响参与或不参与的结构、态度和行为方面。

结果

75家诊所完成了审计,49家在初步同意后退出,23家一开始就拒绝参与。与拒绝参与的诊所相比,参与的诊所更有可能认为咨询小组有用或构成威胁,对审计有积极看法,但此前进行涉及实施变革的审计的可能性较小。与退出的诊所相比,参与的诊所更有可能对审计有积极看法,并在诊所内部讨论过是否参与,但认为咨询小组有用的可能性较小。退出的最常见原因是时间不足。

结论

参与受到对审计总体尤其是对咨询小组的态度以及诊所内部沟通等行为方面的影响。实际支持和资源可能有助于一些诊所进行审计,但咨询小组还必须处理实践团队中的态度和沟通不畅问题。

相似文献

1
Audit in general practice: factors influencing participation.
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):31-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.31.
3
Factors influencing audit in general practice.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1996;9(5):5-9. doi: 10.1108/09526869610124984.
4
Assessing the work of medical audit advisory groups in promoting audit in general practice.
Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec;4(4):234-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.234.
5
A survey of audit activity in general practice.
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Feb;48(427):979-81.
6
Response to paper on "Audit of the use of vitamin B12 in general practice".
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Apr 28;288(6426):1275-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6426.1275.
7
Survey of general practice audit in Leeds.
BMJ. 1991 Feb 16;302(6773):390-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.390.
8
Investigation into the attitudes of general practitioners in Staffordshire to medical audit.
Qual Health Care. 1996 Mar;5(1):13-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.1.13.
9
Audit activity and quality of completed audit projects in primary care in Staffordshire.
Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;4(3):178-83. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.3.178.

引用本文的文献

3
Duration of antibiotic treatment for respiratory tract infections in primary care.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Feb 25;7(1):dlaf028. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf028. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Marked differences in GPs' diagnosis of pneumonia between Denmark and Spain: a cross-sectional study.
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Dec;22(4):454-8. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00093.
8
[Antibiotic prescribing in respiratory tract infections and predictive factors for their use].
Aten Primaria. 2010 Jan;42(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.04.018. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
9

本文引用的文献

1
Multidisciplinary audit in primary healthcare teams: facilitation by audit support staff.
Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):164-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.164.
2
Where have all the pennies gone? The work of Manchester Medical Audit Advisory Group.
BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):98-102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.98.
3
Information systems for general practitioners for quality assessment: I. Responses of the doctors.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Nov 23;291(6507):1473-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6507.1473.
4
Survey of general practice audit in Leeds.
BMJ. 1991 Feb 16;302(6773):390-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.390.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验