• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

便士都去哪儿了?曼彻斯特医学审计咨询小组的工作。

Where have all the pennies gone? The work of Manchester Medical Audit Advisory Group.

作者信息

Johnson R

机构信息

Postgraduate Health Sciences Centre, Manchester.

出版信息

BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):98-102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.98.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.309.6947.98
PMID:8038680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2540543/
Abstract

Medical audit has its critics, who point to the large sums of NHS cash that seem to be disappearing down a medical plughole. These criticisms are recognised by medical audit advisory groups but there are many reasons why the work of these groups has not yet resulted in many publications in journals or bumped up health indicators. After discussing the criticism this article describes the work of the medical audit advisory group in Manchester. Real changes in cooperative working with general practice teams and between practices are taking place, and improved relationships between general practice and the hospitals are being helped by joint audit work. The Manchester group is also working to help in setting standards and to cooperate with purchasing. The work of the group is changing as it develops.

摘要

医学审计也受到一些批评者的质疑,他们指出国民保健制度(NHS)投入的大量资金似乎都消失在了医疗这个无底洞中。这些批评意见已被医学审计咨询小组所认可,但该小组的工作尚未在期刊上发表大量文章或提升健康指标,原因有很多。在讨论完这些批评意见后,本文将介绍曼彻斯特医学审计咨询小组的工作。与全科医疗团队以及不同诊所之间的合作方式正在发生切实的变化,联合审计工作也有助于改善全科医疗与医院之间的关系。曼彻斯特小组还致力于协助制定标准并与采购部门合作。随着自身的发展,该小组的工作也在不断变化。

相似文献

1
Where have all the pennies gone? The work of Manchester Medical Audit Advisory Group.便士都去哪儿了?曼彻斯特医学审计咨询小组的工作。
BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):98-102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.98.
2
Medical audit and quality of care--a new English initiative.医学审计与医疗质量——一项新的英国倡议。
Qual Assur Health Care. 1992 Jun;4(2):89-95.
3
Promoting audit in primary care: roles and relationships of medical audit advisory groups and their managers.促进基层医疗中的审计工作:医疗审计咨询小组及其管理人员的角色与关系
Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;4(3):166-73. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.3.166.
4
MAAGs (Medical Audit Advisory Groups): the Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1993;6(3):4-8. doi: 10.1108/09526869310038415.
5
Assessing the work of medical audit advisory groups in promoting audit in general practice.评估医疗审计咨询小组在促进全科医疗审计方面的工作。
Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec;4(4):234-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.234.
6
The future of clinical audit: learning to work together.临床审计的未来:学会共同协作。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 7;313(7057):574. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.574.
7
Audit activity and quality of completed audit projects in primary care in Staffordshire.斯塔福德郡基层医疗中已完成审计项目的审计活动与质量
Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;4(3):178-83. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.3.178.
8
Auditing audits: use and development of the Oxfordshire Medical Audit Advisory Group rating system.审计审核:牛津郡医疗审计咨询小组评级系统的使用与发展
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):513-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6953.513.
9
Factors influencing audit in general practice.影响全科医疗审计的因素。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1996;9(5):5-9. doi: 10.1108/09526869610124984.
10
Medical audit and general practice.
Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):511-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92846-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.回顾性审核:有效临床审核的障碍与促进因素
Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):23-36. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.23.
2
Investigation into the attitudes of general practitioners in Staffordshire to medical audit.对斯塔福德郡全科医生对医疗审计态度的调查。
Qual Health Care. 1996 Mar;5(1):13-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.1.13.
3
Preventing ischaemic heart disease in one general practice: from one patient, through clinical audit, needs assessment, and commissioning into quality improvement.在一家普通诊所预防缺血性心脏病:从一名患者入手,经过临床审计、需求评估,并通过委托开展工作以实现质量改进。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 24;317(7166):1120-3; discussion 1124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1120.
4
Is general practice audit alive and well? The view from Portsmouth.全科医疗审计现状如何?来自朴茨茅斯的观点。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Dec;46(413):735-6.
5
Medical audit advisory groups. More investment means better audit.医学审计咨询小组。更多投资意味着更好的审计。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 24;309(6957):811.
6
Medical audit advisory groups. Consider the number of practices.医疗审计咨询小组。考虑医疗机构的数量。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 24;309(6957):811. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6957.811.
7
Audit in general practice: factors influencing participation.全科医疗中的审计:影响参与的因素
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):31-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.31.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing role of medical audit advisory groups.医学审计咨询小组的发展作用。
Qual Health Care. 1993 Dec;2(4):232-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.232.
2
HA law.《健康保险流通与责任法案》(美国联邦法律,通常用其英文缩写“HA law”表示,全称为Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) (因未给出更多背景信息,按常见的一种理解翻译,具体含义可根据实际情况调整)
Health Serv J. 1993 Jan 7;103(5334):21.
3
The effects of peer review in general practice.同行评审在全科医疗中的作用。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Jan;38(306):10-3.
4
Auditing audits: the method of Oxfordshire Medical Audit Advisory Group.审核审核:牛津郡医疗审核咨询小组的方法。
BMJ. 1991 Nov 16;303(6812):1247-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6812.1247.