• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Harold E. Varmus, MD.

作者信息

Varmus H E

出版信息

J Investig Med. 1995 Jun;43(3):220-6.

PMID:7614067
Abstract

On November 19, 1993, the Senate approved the nomination of Harold E. Varmus, MD, as Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Varmus, who received the 1989 Nobel Prize in Medicine, brought unquestioned credentials as a scientist to the NIH. Despite his limited background as an administrator, Varmus has received high marks from most observers for improving the morale of NIH staffers and implementing streamlined procedures in the grant review process. His tenure has not been free of controversy, however. Many clinical researchers have long felt there is a bias in NIH study sections against patient-oriented research. A recent study sponsored by the Division of Research Grants confirmed the lower success rate of patient-oriented research proposals, but the outcome of these findings remains unclear. Faced with mounting political pressure for a balanced budget, and the resultant reduction of funding to many branches of government, Varmus has been a strong voice for non-targeted investigator initiated research. Interviewed in his office in Building One on the NIH campus in Bethesda, Maryland, Varmus discussed the state of patient oriented research, the evolving role of the NIH in supporting science, and just where the money to pay for it should be found.

摘要

相似文献

1
Harold E. Varmus, MD.
J Investig Med. 1995 Jun;43(3):220-6.
2
Biomedical research funding: when the game gets tough, winners start to play.生物医学研究资金:当竞争变得激烈时,赢家开始行动。
Bioessays. 2007 Sep;29(9):933-6. doi: 10.1002/bies.20633.
3
Trends in program project grant funding at the National Cancer Institute.美国国立癌症研究所项目计划资助情况的趋势
Cancer Res. 1993 Feb 1;53(3):477-84.
4
Trends in research support and productivity in the changing environment of academic surgery.学术外科不断变化的环境下研究支持与生产力的趋势
J Surg Res. 2004 Feb;116(2):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2003.10.012.
5
Perspective: is NIH funding the "best science by the best scientists"? A critique of the NIH R01 research grant review policies.观点:NIH 的资金是否用于“最优秀的科学家开展的最佳科学研究”?对 NIH R01 研究资助审查政策的批评。
Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):775-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d74256.
6
Did a rising tide lift all boats? The NIH budget and pediatric research portfolio.水涨船高?美国国立卫生研究院的预算与儿科研究项目
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):113-24. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.113.
7
Family medicine research funding.家庭医学研究资金。
Fam Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;31(10):709-12.
8
Rescuing the NIH before it is too late.趁为时未晚拯救美国国立卫生研究院。
J Clin Invest. 2006 Apr;116(4):844. doi: 10.1172/JCI28364.
9
The sad and bleak future for urology funding at the National Institutes of Health.美国国立卫生研究院泌尿外科研究经费的黯淡前景。
Urol Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;36(1):85-93, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.08.008.
10
Harold Varmus [interview by Karen Birmingham].哈罗德·瓦慕斯 [凯伦·伯明翰采访]
Nat Med. 2001 Jan;7(1):10. doi: 10.1038/83228.