Wu M K, Wesselink P R
Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Academic Centre For Dentistry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Apr;79(4):492-6. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80134-9.
Various techniques for root canal instrumentation may have different effects in cleaning curved root canals, especially their apical portions. One hundred thirty-five mesiobuccal canals with an average curvature of 25 degrees from human mandibular molars were treated with step-back, crown-down pressureless, or balanced-force techniques with 2% sodium hypochlorite used as an irrigant. The cleaning efficacy of these techniques was evaluated by counting the remaining surface debris under a stereomicroscope with a calibrated eyepiece micrometer. The results indicated that the apical portion of the canal was less clean than the middle and coronal portions regardless of the technique performed and that the balanced-force technique produced a cleaner apical portion of the canal than did the other techniques studied.
各种根管预备技术在清洁弯曲根管尤其是根尖部分时可能会有不同的效果。对135条来自人类下颌磨牙、平均弯曲度为25度的近中颊根管,采用逐步后退法、冠向下无压力法或平衡力法进行治疗,并使用2%的次氯酸钠作为冲洗剂。通过使用校准目镜测微计在体视显微镜下计数剩余的表面碎屑来评估这些技术的清洁效果。结果表明,无论采用何种技术,根管的根尖部分都不如中部和冠部清洁,并且平衡力法比其他研究的技术能使根管的根尖部分更清洁。