Suppr超能文献

[An ergonomic analysis of 5 technics for moving patients]].

作者信息

Benevolo E, Sessarego P, Zaliani A, Zelaschi G, Franchignoni F

机构信息

Istituto Scientifico per la Riabilitazione, Genova-Nervi Fondazione Clinica del Lavoro, IRCCS.

出版信息

G Ital Med Lav. 1993 Sep-Nov;15(5-6):139-44.

PMID:7615174
Abstract

Nursing personnel and physical therapists refer to the lifting and moving of patients as the most important determinant of occupationally related low-back pain. This study was conducted in 12 nurses and 12 patients, to compare three methods of transferring patients from bed to wheelchair; (I) manual lifting, (II) an assistive device-a walking belt (with both one- and two-person transfers) and (III) a mechanical hoist. After completion of a given transfer, nurses were asked to rate the physical stress and how secure they felt the method was. Patients were asked to rate how secure and comfortable they felt. We also recorded the time required to make each transfer. The walking belt two persons had the most favourable ratings (the least stressful and most secure and comfortable), however transfers with this method took longer than those with the manual methods (although less than transfers with the hoist). Both nurses and patients rated one-person manual lifting as most stressful and least secure. Two-person transfer methods were preferred to the corresponding one-person methods. The hoist was the least suitable transfer method in view of the corresponding one-person methods. The hoist was the least suitable transfer method in view of the considerable physical stresses to the nurses, perceived lack of safety, discomfort for the patients and time involved.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验