France C P, Gerak L R, Flynn D, Winger G D, Medzihradsky F, Bagley J R, Brockunier L L, Woods J H
Department of Pharmacology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 Jul;274(1):17-28.
These studies examined the opioid receptor binding affinities and behavioral effects of several fentanyl derivatives in rhesus monkeys. OHM3295, OHM3296, OHM3326 and OHM3463 displayed high affinity for mu (IC50 = 7-66 nM) as compared to kappa (IC50 = 263-3255 nM) or delta (IC50 = 480-4500 nM) receptors as measured by their ability to displace 3Henkephalin, 3H-N-[2- (1-pyrrolidinyl)1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-8-yl]benzeneacetamide and 3Henkephalin, respectively. All four compounds maintained i.v. self-administration responding at rates above those maintained by the mu agonist alfentanil. In drug discrimination studies, OHM3463, OHM3326 and OHM3296 substituted completely for nalbuphine whereas OHM3295, and a related compound, mirfentanil, substituted partially for nalbuphine. In morphine-treated monkeys, OHM3295 substituted for naltrexone; in monkeys acutely deprived of morphine, only OHM3463 reversed naltrexone-lever responding. All four compounds had antinociceptive effects, although the extent to which these effects were accompanied by respiratory depression or modified by naltrexone, as well as the interactions between antinociceptive effects of fentanyl derivatives and alfentanil, varied markedly among compounds. Thus, OHM3463 shared effects with mu agonists (e.g., alfentanil) under all conditions; the other three compounds had opioid agonist effects under only a subset of conditions. Moreover, one of these compounds (OHM3295) antagonized the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive effects of other mu agonists. Collectively, these compounds appear to vary on two dimensions: opioid efficacy and the contribution of nonopioid actions to their antinociceptive effects. Together with results obtained with other fentanyl derivatives (mirfentanil) under similar conditions, results of the current study suggest this chemical class might be especially fertile for the development of novel analgesics that might have reduced toxicity and abuse liability as compared to fentanyl and related compounds that are currently used in medicine.
这些研究考察了几种芬太尼衍生物在恒河猴体内的阿片受体结合亲和力及行为效应。与κ受体(IC50 = 263 - 3255 nM)或δ受体(IC50 = 480 - 4500 nM)相比,OHM3295、OHM3296、OHM3326和OHM3463对μ受体表现出高亲和力(IC50 = 7 - 66 nM),这是通过它们分别取代[3H](D - Ala2 - Me - Phe4,Glyol5)脑啡肽、3H - N - [2 - (1 - 吡咯烷基)1 - 氧杂螺[4,5]癸 - 8 - 基]苯乙酰胺和[3H](D - Pen2 - D - Pen5)脑啡肽的能力来测定的。所有这四种化合物维持静脉自身给药反应的速率高于μ激动剂阿芬太尼维持的速率。在药物辨别研究中,OHM3463、OHM3326和OHM3296能完全替代纳布啡,而OHM3295以及一种相关化合物米芬太尼只能部分替代纳布啡。在吗啡处理的猴子中,OHM3295能替代纳曲酮;在急性戒断吗啡的猴子中,只有OHM3463能逆转纳曲酮杠杆反应。所有这四种化合物都有镇痛作用,但这些作用伴随呼吸抑制的程度或受纳曲酮影响的程度,以及芬太尼衍生物与阿芬太尼镇痛作用之间的相互作用,在不同化合物之间有显著差异。因此,OHM3463在所有条件下都与μ激动剂(如阿芬太尼)有共同作用;其他三种化合物仅在部分条件下有阿片样激动剂作用。此外,其中一种化合物(OHM3295)能拮抗其他μ激动剂的辨别刺激和镇痛作用。总体而言,这些化合物似乎在两个维度上存在差异:阿片样效能以及非阿片样作用对其镇痛作用的贡献。与在类似条件下用其他芬太尼衍生物(米芬太尼)获得的结果一起,本研究结果表明,与目前医学中使用的芬太尼及相关化合物相比,这类化学物质可能在开发毒性和滥用可能性降低的新型镇痛药方面特别有成效。