Reviewing scientific papers.
作者信息
McKenzie S
机构信息
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London.
出版信息
Arch Dis Child. 1995 Jun;72(6):539-40. doi: 10.1136/adc.72.6.539.
Abstract
Guidelines for the preparation of structured reports for laboratory studies, clinical studies, epidemiological studies, and observations could be useful. A structured report should prompt reviewers to acknowledge familiarity or otherwise with method, background papers, and so on. New reviewers could draw up their own system. Reports should be helpful and courteous so that whether or not the paper is accepted for publication the authors have a chance to improve it.
摘要
相似文献
1
Reviewing scientific papers.
Arch Dis Child. 1995 Jun;72(6):539-40. doi: 10.1136/adc.72.6.539.
2
To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers.接受还是拒绝？医学期刊论文同行评审指南。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2012;19(2):e328-33. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
3
An audit of the editorial process and peer review in the journal Clinical rehabilitation.《临床康复》杂志编辑流程与同行评审审核
Clin Rehabil. 2004 Mar;18(2):117-24. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr726ed.
4
The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study.《澳大利亚医学杂志》网络同行评议研究。
Lancet. 1998 Aug 8;352(9126):441-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11510-0.
5
How to review scientific manuscripts and clinical case reports for Journal of Oral Implantology.如何为《口腔种植学杂志》审阅科学手稿和临床病例报告。
J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(6):310-4. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00053R1.1.
6
Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.《克罗地亚医学杂志》科学文章同行评审指南。
Croat Med J. 2005 Apr;46(2):326-32.
7
8
Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.审阅同行评议期刊的稿件：新手和经验丰富的审稿人的入门指南。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Aug;42(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x.
9
A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.审阅稿件的系统指南。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):848-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0782.
10
Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.审视同行评审：投稿时你会遇到的三位评审人。
Can J Nurs Res. 2006 Dec;38(4):5-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Process of peer review continues.同行评审过程仍在继续。
Indian J Orthop. 2013 Nov;47(6):537-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.121568.
2
The JAMIA Student Editorial Board: peer review education in biomedical informatics.《美国医学信息学会杂志》学生编辑委员会：生物医学信息学中的同行评审教育。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):87-8. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1473.
本文引用的文献
1
The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.给出高质量评审意见的同行评审者的特征。
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Aug;8(8):422-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02599618.
2
Reflections of a former editor.
Arch Surg. 1993 Dec;128(12):1305-14. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420240013001.
3
The science of reviewing research.研究综述科学
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:125-33; discussion 133-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26342.x.
4
Chance, concurrence, and clustering. Analysis of reviewers' recommendations on 1,000 submissions to the Journal of Clinical Investigation.机遇、巧合与聚集性。对《临床研究杂志》1000份投稿的审稿人建议分析。
J Clin Invest. 1994 May;93(5):1877-80. doi: 10.1172/JCI117177.
5
Referee bias.
Nature. 1994 Jan 13;367(6459):108. doi: 10.1038/367108c0.
Zotero 插件