Schutte J B, Pack M
TNO Nutrition and Food Research (ILOB), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Arch Tierernahr. 1994;46(3):261-8. doi: 10.1080/17450399409381775.
In two growth experiments on broilers of 6 to 27 days of age, the biological efficacy of three L-lysine preparations containing biomass was evaluated in comparison to L-lysine.HCl. L-lysine from the different sources was added in graded levels to a basal diet deficient in lysine, but adequate in all other nutrients. From multi-exponential regression analysis of weight gain and feed conversion responses, biological efficacy of the three L-lysine preparations containing biomass was estimated to be 97%, 103%, and 113%, respectively. None of these estimates was significantly different from 100%. Thus, it is concluded that the efficacy of the L-lysine preparations to deliver lysine is equivalent to L-lysine.HCl.
在两项针对6至27日龄肉鸡的生长实验中,将三种含生物质的L-赖氨酸制剂与L-盐酸赖氨酸相比,评估了其生物学效价。将来自不同来源的L-赖氨酸以分级水平添加到赖氨酸缺乏但其他所有营养素充足的基础日粮中。通过对体重增加和饲料转化率反应的多指数回归分析,估计三种含生物质的L-赖氨酸制剂的生物学效价分别为97%、103%和113%。这些估计值均与100%无显著差异。因此,得出结论,L-赖氨酸制剂提供赖氨酸的效价与L-盐酸赖氨酸相当。