• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试一种衡量母亲对母乳喂养评价的工具的有效性和可靠性。

Testing validity and reliability of an instrument which measures maternal evaluation of breastfeeding.

作者信息

Riordan J M, Woodley G, Heaton K

出版信息

J Hum Lact. 1994 Dec;10(4):231-5. doi: 10.1177/089033449401000416.

DOI:10.1177/089033449401000416
PMID:7619277
Abstract

Breastfeeding satisfaction is usually measured by how long a mother breastfeeds. Lack of another method to measure the mother's evaluation of breastfeeding has been a barrier to breastfeeding research. This study tested validity and reliability of the Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale (MBFES), a new tool which measures mothers' satisfaction with breastfeeding. The sample consisted of 73 women who attended breastfeeding classes in a midwestern hospital. MBFES scores were significantly correlated with the length of time mothers intended to breastfeed (r = .31) and the length of time they breastfed (r = .49), which supports validity. Correlation coefficients for the scale and subscales, .83, .73, .76, and .78, respectively, indicated acceptable internal consistency among items in the scale. These findings support reliability and validity of the MBFES for clinical use.

摘要

母乳喂养满意度通常通过母亲母乳喂养的时长来衡量。缺乏另一种衡量母亲对母乳喂养评价的方法一直是母乳喂养研究的一个障碍。本研究测试了母亲母乳喂养评价量表(MBFES)的有效性和可靠性,这是一种衡量母亲对母乳喂养满意度的新工具。样本包括73名在中西部一家医院参加母乳喂养课程的女性。MBFES得分与母亲打算母乳喂养的时长(r = 0.31)和她们实际母乳喂养的时长(r = 0.49)显著相关,这支持了该量表的有效性。该量表及其子量表的相关系数分别为0.83、0.73、0.76和0.78,表明量表中各项目之间具有可接受的内部一致性。这些发现支持了MBFES在临床应用中的可靠性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Testing validity and reliability of an instrument which measures maternal evaluation of breastfeeding.测试一种衡量母亲对母乳喂养评价的工具的有效性和可靠性。
J Hum Lact. 1994 Dec;10(4):231-5. doi: 10.1177/089033449401000416.
2
Validation of the Arabic Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale (MBFES-A) among Lebanese women.阿拉伯语产妇母乳喂养评估量表(MBFES-A)在黎巴嫩女性中的效度验证。
Int Breastfeed J. 2021 Aug 21;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00409-w.
3
Development of the revised Japanese Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale, short version.修订版日本产妇母乳喂养评估量表简版的研制
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017 May;26(3):392-395. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.032016.08.
4
The development of the Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale.产妇母乳喂养评估量表的研制
J Hum Lact. 1994 Jun;10(2):105-11. doi: 10.1177/089033449401000217.
5
Evaluating the association of two breastfeeding assessment tools with breastfeeding problems and breastfeeding satisfaction.评估两种母乳喂养评估工具与母乳喂养问题及母乳喂养满意度之间的关联。
J Hum Lact. 1999 Mar;15(1):35-9. doi: 10.1177/089033449901500110.
6
Development and psychometric testing of the Japanese version of the maternal breastfeeding evaluation scale.日本版母亲母乳喂养评估量表的编制与心理测量学测试
J Hum Lact. 2013 Nov;29(4):611-9. doi: 10.1177/0890334413491142. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
7
The Beginning Breastfeeding Survey: measuring mothers' perceptions of breastfeeding effectiveness during the postpartum hospitalization.《母乳喂养初始情况调查》:在产后住院期间测量母亲对母乳喂养有效性的看法。
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Aug;33(4):329-44. doi: 10.1002/nur.20384.
8
Validity and reliability of the Perceived Readiness for Discharge After Birth Scale.产后出院准备度感知量表的效度和信度
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1):34-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00020.x.
9
Predicting breastfeeding duration using the LATCH breastfeeding assessment tool.使用LATCH母乳喂养评估工具预测母乳喂养持续时间。
J Hum Lact. 2001 Feb;17(1):20-3. doi: 10.1177/089033440101700105.
10
Maternal and professional assessment of breastfeeding.母乳喂养的母亲及专业评估
J Hum Lact. 1997 Dec;13(4):279-83. doi: 10.1177/089033449701300412.

引用本文的文献

1
Stimulation Therapy to Induce Mothers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.诱导母亲的刺激疗法:一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 29;13:e63463. doi: 10.2196/63463.
2
Psychometric properties of the maternal breastfeeding evaluation scale: a confirmatory factor analysis.母乳喂养评价量表的心理测量特性:验证性因子分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06693-8.
3
Women's Satisfaction with Breastfeeding and Risk of Exclusive Breastfeeding Interruption.
女性对母乳喂养的满意度与纯母乳喂养中断的风险。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 11;15(24):5062. doi: 10.3390/nu15245062.
4
Validation of the Arabic Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale (MBFES-A) among Lebanese women.阿拉伯语产妇母乳喂养评估量表(MBFES-A)在黎巴嫩女性中的效度验证。
Int Breastfeed J. 2021 Aug 21;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00409-w.
5
Breastfeeding satisfaction post hospital discharge and associated factors - a longitudinal cohort study of mothers of preterm infants.产后出院后母乳喂养满意度及其相关因素-早产儿母亲的纵向队列研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2021 Mar 25;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00374-4.
6
Maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding in the first month postpartum and associated factors.产妇产后第一个月对母乳喂养的满意度及其相关因素。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Aug 17;15(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00312-w.
7
Breastfeeding success with the use of the inverted syringe technique for management of inverted nipples in lactating women: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.使用倒置注射器技术管理哺乳期妇女乳头内陷以实现母乳喂养成功:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3880-8.
8
Validation of a tool to evaluate women's satisfaction with breastfeeding for the Brazilian population.评估巴西女性对母乳喂养满意度的工具的验证。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020 Jan-Feb;96(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Breastfeeding difficulties and supports and risk of postpartum depression in a cohort of womenwho have given birth in Calgary: a prospective cohort study.卡尔加里分娩女性队列中的母乳喂养困难、支持与产后抑郁风险:一项前瞻性队列研究
CMAJ Open. 2016 Mar 21;4(1):E103-9. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150009. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.
10
Is baby-friendly breastfeeding support in maternity hospitals associated with breastfeeding satisfaction among Japanese mothers?日本妇产医院提供的爱婴母乳喂养支持与日本母亲的母乳喂养满意度有关吗?
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Jun;19(6):1252-62. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1631-8.