• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母乳喂养的母亲及专业评估

Maternal and professional assessment of breastfeeding.

作者信息

Adams D, Hewell S

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Lact. 1997 Dec;13(4):279-83. doi: 10.1177/089033449701300412.

DOI:10.1177/089033449701300412
PMID:9429362
Abstract

This study explored the relationships among maternal and professional breastfeeding assessments and maternal reports of satisfaction with breastfeeding. Participants were 35 first-time breastfeeding mothers. The LATCH Breastfeeding Documentation Tool was used for data collection. This tool was used in its original version for professional assessment and in a modified version for maternal reporting. Results show high percentages (85.7 to 100) of agreement among lactation consultants using the LATCH tool which supports the reliability of the tool. Correlation coefficients between professional scores and maternal scores ranged from 0.18 for "A" (Audible swallowing) to 0.67 for "L" (Latch). It appears that, unlike lactation consultants, new mothers evaluate breastfeeding based upon their somatic experience rather than observation of infant behavior.

摘要

本研究探讨了产妇和专业母乳喂养评估之间的关系,以及产妇对母乳喂养满意度的报告。研究对象为35名首次进行母乳喂养的母亲。采用LATCH母乳喂养记录工具收集数据。该工具的原始版本用于专业评估,修改版本用于产妇报告。结果显示,使用LATCH工具的泌乳顾问之间的一致率很高(85.7%至100%),这支持了该工具的可靠性。专业评分与产妇评分之间的相关系数范围从“A”(可听见吞咽声)的0.18到“L”(含接情况)的0.67。与泌乳顾问不同,初为人母者似乎是根据自身身体感受而非对婴儿行为的观察来评估母乳喂养情况。

相似文献

1
Maternal and professional assessment of breastfeeding.母乳喂养的母亲及专业评估
J Hum Lact. 1997 Dec;13(4):279-83. doi: 10.1177/089033449701300412.
2
Evaluating the association of two breastfeeding assessment tools with breastfeeding problems and breastfeeding satisfaction.评估两种母乳喂养评估工具与母乳喂养问题及母乳喂养满意度之间的关联。
J Hum Lact. 1999 Mar;15(1):35-9. doi: 10.1177/089033449901500110.
3
The relationship between breastfeeding self-efficacy and LATCH scores and affecting factors.母乳喂养自我效能感与LATCH评分之间的关系及影响因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Apr;26(7-8):994-1004. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13423. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
4
Testing validity and reliability of an instrument which measures maternal evaluation of breastfeeding.测试一种衡量母亲对母乳喂养评价的工具的有效性和可靠性。
J Hum Lact. 1994 Dec;10(4):231-5. doi: 10.1177/089033449401000416.
5
Development of the H & H Lactation Scale.H&H泌乳量表的开发。
Nurs Res. 1996 May-Jun;45(3):136-40. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199605000-00003.
6
Validity and reliability of the infant breastfeeding assessment tool, the mother baby assessment tool, and the LATCH scoring system.婴儿母乳喂养评估工具、母婴评估工具及LATCH评分系统的有效性和可靠性。
Breastfeed Med. 2014 May;9(4):191-5. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0018. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
7
Workplace lactation support, Part I: A return-to-work breastfeeding assessment tool.职场哺乳期支持,第一部分:重返工作岗位母乳喂养评估工具。
J Hum Lact. 1998 Sep;14(3):249-54. doi: 10.1177/089033449801400319.
8
Comparison of the breastfeeding patterns of mothers who delivered their babies per vagina and via cesarean section: an observational study using the LATCH breastfeeding charting system.经阴道分娩和剖宫产分娩的母亲母乳喂养模式比较:一项使用LATCH母乳喂养记录系统的观察性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.018. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
9
Predicting breastfeeding duration using the LATCH breastfeeding assessment tool.使用LATCH母乳喂养评估工具预测母乳喂养持续时间。
J Hum Lact. 2001 Feb;17(1):20-3. doi: 10.1177/089033440101700105.
10
The LATCH scoring system and prediction of breastfeeding duration.LATCH评分系统与母乳喂养持续时间的预测
J Hum Lact. 2006 Nov;22(4):391-7. doi: 10.1177/0890334406293161.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Supplemental Nursing System on Sucking Success, Weight Gain Findings and Bilirubin Level in Newborns: A Randomized Controlled Trial.补充护理系统对新生儿吸吮成功率、体重增加情况及胆红素水平的影响:一项随机对照试验
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Feb;29(2):258-268. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04039-0. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
2
The effect of virtual reality on the breastfeeding process: a randomized controlled study.虚拟现实对母乳喂养过程的影响:一项随机对照研究。
J Perinatol. 2024 Nov;44(11):1611-1616. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02077-0. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Psychometric properties of clinician-reported and performance-based outcomes cited in a scoping review on spinal manipulation and mobilization for pediatric populations with diverse medical conditions: a systematic review.
一项关于针对患有多种疾病的儿科人群进行脊柱推拿和松动术的范围综述中引用的临床医生报告结局和基于表现的结局的心理测量学特性:一项系统综述。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Jun;32(3):255-283. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2269038. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
4
How to Treat a Tongue-tie: An Evidence-based Algorithm of Care.如何治疗舌系带过短:基于证据的护理算法
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jan 25;9(1):e3336. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003336. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population.多民族人群产后初期 LATCH 母乳喂养评估工具 5 项和 4 项版本的心理测量学评估
PLoS One. 2016 May 2;11(5):e0154331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154331. eCollection 2016.
6
Assessment Tools for Evaluation of Oral Feeding in Infants Younger Than 6 Months.6个月以下婴儿经口喂养评估工具
Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Apr;16(2):143-50. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000255.
7
Maternal, Infant Characteristics, Breastfeeding Techniques, and Initiation: Structural Equation Modeling Approaches.孕产妇、婴儿特征、母乳喂养技巧及开始母乳喂养:结构方程模型方法
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 13;10(11):e0142861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142861. eCollection 2015.