Muris J W, Starmans R, Fijten G H, Crebolder H F, Schouten H J, Knottnerus J A
Department of General Practice, University of Limburg, Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jun;45(395):313-6.
Although many patients are evaluated initially by their general practitioner, clinicians' accuracy at diagnosing organic gastrointestinal disease has not been studied in a primary care setting. Different spectra of severity of disease in general practice and hospital populations may lead to different values for diagnostic tests in these two populations.
This study set out to determine the diagnostic value of history and physical and laboratory items for organic and neoplastic disease in general practice patients with nonacute abdominal complaints.
The one-year prospective, observational study was carried out in 1989 in 80 general practices in Limburg, the Netherlands. The study subjects were 933 patients (aged 18-75 years) presenting to their general practitioner with new non-acute abdominal complaints of minimum duration two weeks, and with whom the doctor had a diagnostic problem. Patients were physically examined by their general practitioner and asked to complete pre-structured questionnaires. Basic laboratory tests were carried out. Patients were followed up for at least one year by researchers and then a diagnosis was determined by an independent panel of three general practitioners using patient records, blinded for the results of the questionnaires. Sensitivity, specificity and odds ratios were calculated for clinical items. Stepwise forward logistic regression analysis was undertaken to identify independent predictors of organic gastrointestinal disease.
Of the 933 patients 14% had organic gastrointestinal disease. No clinical item had both high sensitivity and specificity. Logistic regression analysis showed only eight independent predictors of organic disease: male sex, greater age, epigastric pain, no specific character to pain, pain affecting sleep, history of blood in stool, no pain relief after defecation and abnormal white blood cell count. When the model was programmed to predict neoplasms five items were found: male sex, greater age, no specific character to pain, weight loss and erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 20 mm hour-1.
In a general practice population with non-acute abdominal complaints some clinical findings can be used as predictors for organic and neoplastic gastrointestinal disease.
尽管许多患者最初由其全科医生进行评估,但在初级保健环境中,临床医生诊断器质性胃肠疾病的准确性尚未得到研究。全科医疗和医院人群中疾病严重程度的不同范围可能导致这两个人群中诊断测试的价值不同。
本研究旨在确定病史、体格检查和实验室检查项目对患有非急性腹部不适的全科医疗患者的器质性和肿瘤性疾病的诊断价值。
1989年在荷兰林堡的80家全科诊所进行了为期一年的前瞻性观察研究。研究对象为933例患者(年龄18 - 75岁),他们因新出现的非急性腹部不适(持续时间至少两周)就诊于全科医生,且医生对其诊断存在问题。患者由其全科医生进行体格检查,并被要求完成预先设计好的问卷。进行了基本的实验室检查。研究人员对患者进行了至少一年的随访,然后由三名全科医生组成的独立小组根据患者记录确定诊断,该小组对问卷结果不知情。计算了临床项目的敏感性、特异性和比值比。进行逐步向前逻辑回归分析以确定器质性胃肠疾病的独立预测因素。
933例患者中,14%患有器质性胃肠疾病。没有一个临床项目同时具有高敏感性和特异性。逻辑回归分析仅显示了器质性疾病的八个独立预测因素:男性、年龄较大、上腹部疼痛、疼痛无特异性、疼痛影响睡眠、便血史、排便后疼痛无缓解以及白细胞计数异常。当该模型被编程用于预测肿瘤时,发现了五个项目:男性、年龄较大、疼痛无特异性、体重减轻和红细胞沉降率大于20毫米/小时。
在患有非急性腹部不适的全科医疗人群中,一些临床发现可作为器质性和肿瘤性胃肠疾病的预测指标。