• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视网膜专家与标准化阅片中心通过眼底摄影诊断糖尿病视网膜病变的一致性。墨西哥城糖尿病研究视网膜病变组。

Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group.

作者信息

Gonzalez M E, Gonzalez C, Stern M P, Arredondo B, Martinez S

机构信息

Centro de Estudios en Diabetes, American British Cowdray Hospital, México, D.F.

出版信息

Arch Med Res. 1995 Summer;26(2):127-31.

PMID:7620277
Abstract

Proper detection and adequate laser therapy of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using guidelines established by landmark studies is important to prevent blindness. We analyzed the agreement between diagnostic classification of DR as determined by certified retina specialists compared with standardized readings of fundus photographs performed by the Fundus Photograph Reading Center (FPRC) of the University of Wisconsin. Color fundus stereophotographs of seven standard fields of each eye of 15 diabetics were sent to FPRC and to 11 retina specialists practicing in Mexico City and representing the major health care institutions. These centers are sites for training programs in ophthalmology. In addition, leading specialists in private practice were invited to participate. Their diagnostic criteria were surveyed. Information was collected using a specially designed form on which the investigator entered his/her diagnostic classification using his/her clinical judgment. Mean overall percent agreement was 74%. Kappa statistic, which corrects for chance agreement, was between 0.29-0.87 with a mean of 0.53. Weighted kappa measuring level of disagreement was between 0.34-0.90, mean 0.57. Data were analyzed separately for macular edema and for this end point the weighted kappa statistic was 0.68. Based on conventional interpretation of the kappa statistic, these mean values are in the range of fair agreement. However, since there is a significant discrepancy in the concordance level observed, there is a need for promoting further applications of internationally accepted diagnostic criteria to assure optimal therapy.

摘要

依据具有里程碑意义的研究所确立的指南,对糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)进行恰当检测并实施充分的激光治疗,对于预防失明至关重要。我们分析了由认证视网膜专家确定的DR诊断分类与威斯康星大学眼底照片阅读中心(FPRC)对眼底照片进行的标准化解读之间的一致性。将15名糖尿病患者每只眼睛7个标准视野的彩色眼底立体照片分别发送给FPRC以及墨西哥城11名在主要医疗机构执业的视网膜专家,这些中心是眼科培训项目的所在地,此外还邀请了私人执业的顶尖专家参与。对他们的诊断标准进行了调查,通过专门设计的表格收集信息,研究者依据临床判断在表格上填写自己的诊断分类。总体平均一致率为74%。校正偶然一致性的Kappa统计量在0.29 - 0.87之间,均值为0.53。衡量不一致程度的加权Kappa在0.34 - 0.90之间,均值为0.57。对黄斑水肿的数据进行了单独分析,针对这一终点,加权Kappa统计量为0.68。基于对Kappa统计量的传统解读,这些均值处于中等一致的范围。然而,由于观察到的一致性水平存在显著差异,因此需要推动国际认可的诊断标准的进一步应用,以确保最佳治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group.视网膜专家与标准化阅片中心通过眼底摄影诊断糖尿病视网膜病变的一致性。墨西哥城糖尿病研究视网膜病变组。
Arch Med Res. 1995 Summer;26(2):127-31.
2
Concordance between retina specialists and a preferred practice pattern in treatment and follow-up criteria for diabetic retinopathy. The Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group.视网膜专家与糖尿病视网膜病变治疗及随访标准中首选实践模式之间的一致性。墨西哥城糖尿病研究视网膜病变小组。
Arch Med Res. 1996 Summer;27(2):205-11.
3
Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.用于糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的单视野数字眼底图像解读中的观察者间一致性。
Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):826-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.021.
4
Diabetic macular edema assessed with optical coherence tomography and stereo fundus photography.采用光学相干断层扫描和立体眼底摄影评估糖尿病性黄斑水肿。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Jan;43(1):241-5.
5
A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者眼睛视网膜厚度的定量测绘与立体眼底摄影分级比较
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003 Jan-Feb;34(1):7-16.
6
Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.非散瞳数字视网膜成像与散瞳眼科检查在糖尿病患者非糖尿病性眼病中的比较
Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):833-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.025.
7
Diabetic retinopathy in Mexico. Prevalence and clinical characteristics.
Arch Med Res. 1994 Autumn;25(3):355-60.
8
Automated analysis of retinal images for detection of referable diabetic retinopathy.视网膜图像的自动化分析用于检测可转诊的糖尿病性视网膜病变。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;131(3):351-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1743.
9
Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.在退伍军人事务部糖尿病试验中,比较了散瞳眼底检查和 7 视野立体眼底照相。
J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Sep-Oct;23(5):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
10
Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.检眼镜检查与眼底照片在糖尿病视网膜病变检测及分级中的应用比较
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 May;33(6):1888-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision of Epithelial Defect Measurements.上皮缺损测量的精度。
Cornea. 2017 Apr;36(4):419-424. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001148.
2
National screening programme for diabetic retinopathy. Screening by optometrists is better than screening by fundus photography.糖尿病视网膜病变国家筛查计划。由验光师进行筛查比通过眼底摄影进行筛查更好。
BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):998-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.998.