• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Continuous versus frequent intermittent nebulization of albuterol in acute asthma: a randomized, prospective study.

作者信息

Reisner C, Kotch A, Dworkin G

机构信息

Department of Allergy and Immunology, National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995 Jul;75(1):41-7.

PMID:7621059
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In acute severe asthma the optimal dose, frequency, duration and method of administration of beta-2 agonists is unknown. No study to date has evaluated the efficacy of high dose beta-2 agonists beyond the initial two hours.

OBJECTIVE

(1) To determine whether high-dose continuous nebulization of albuterol (7.5 mg/h) is as safe and as efficacious as high-dose intermittent nebulization of albuterol (2.5 mg every 20 minutes) for four hours. (2) To evaluate whether there is a continual improvement using high dose therapy beyond two hours.

METHODS

We devised a simple means of continuous nebulization calibrated to deliver 7.5 mg albuterol per hour. Twenty-two nonsmoking, patients with acute, severe asthma who presented to the emergency department with less than 60% predicted normal PEFR were randomized to either the continuous or intermittent group. All patients received intravenously 125 mg methyl prednisolone on initiation of the study. No theophylline was administered. Spirometry and vital signs were measured at baseline and every 30 minutes thereafter. Electrocardiograms were obtained on all patients and all patients had continuous cardiac monitoring.

RESULTS

Both groups doubled their baseline spirometric values over the four-hour period (P < .0001). The FEV1 did not differ significantly between regimens at any time interval. Improvement from 120 minutes to 240 minutes was statistically significant (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in vital signs at the end of the study compared with baseline in either group, nor between the two groups at any time interval.

CONCLUSION

High-dose continuous nebulization of albuterol is as safe and as efficacious as intermittent nebulization of albuterol in the early treatment of asthma in an emergency department. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing continued significant improvement beyond the initial two hours of therapy using high dose nebulized beta-2 agonists.

摘要

相似文献

1
Continuous versus frequent intermittent nebulization of albuterol in acute asthma: a randomized, prospective study.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995 Jul;75(1):41-7.
2
Continuous versus intermittent nebulization of salbutamol in acute severe asthma: a randomized, controlled trial.沙丁胺醇持续雾化与间歇雾化治疗急性重症哮喘的随机对照试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Sep;36(3):198-203. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.109169.
3
A randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of continuous nebulized albuterol (15 mg) versus continuous nebulized albuterol (15 mg) plus ipratropium bromide (2 mg) for the treatment of acute asthma.一项随机临床试验,比较持续雾化吸入沙丁胺醇(15毫克)与持续雾化吸入沙丁胺醇(15毫克)加异丙托溴铵(2毫克)治疗急性哮喘的疗效。
J Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;31(4):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.05.025.
4
Comparison of intravenous terbutaline versus normal saline in pediatric patients on continuous high-dose nebulized albuterol for status asthmaticus.在接受持续高剂量沙丁胺醇雾化吸入治疗的哮喘持续状态儿科患者中,静脉注射特布他林与生理盐水的比较。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Jun;23(6):355-61. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000278397.63246.33.
5
Helium/oxygen-driven albuterol nebulization in the treatment of children with moderate to severe asthma exacerbations: a randomized, controlled trial.氦氧驱动沙丁胺醇雾化吸入治疗中重度哮喘急性发作患儿:一项随机对照试验
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1127-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2136.
6
Efficacy of racemic albuterol versus levalbuterol used as a continuous nebulization for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.消旋沙丁胺醇与左旋沙丁胺醇持续雾化吸入治疗急性哮喘加重期的疗效比较:一项随机、双盲临床试验
J Asthma. 2011 Mar;48(2):188-93. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.554939. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
7
Reversal of bronchial obstruction with bi-level positive airway pressure and nebulization in patients with acute asthma.双水平气道正压通气联合雾化吸入治疗急性哮喘患者支气管阻塞的逆转
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):356-61. doi: 10.1080/02770900902718829.
8
Effect of nebulized albuterol on serum potassium and cardiac rhythm in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.雾化吸入沙丁胺醇对哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者血清钾及心律的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 1994 Nov-Dec;14(6):729-33.
9
A comparison of levalbuterol with racemic albuterol in the treatment of acute severe asthma exacerbations in adults.成人急性重度哮喘加重期治疗中左旋沙丁胺醇与消旋沙丁胺醇的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 May;24(3):259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.01.027.
10
The efficacy of ketamine in pediatric emergency department patients who present with acute severe asthma.氯胺酮在患有急性重症哮喘的儿科急诊科患者中的疗效。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;46(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.02.024.

引用本文的文献

1
GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma.GEMA 5.3. 《西班牙哮喘管理指南》。
Open Respir Arch. 2023 Sep 19;5(4):100277. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100277. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
2
Continuous versus intermittent beta-agonists in the treatment of acute asthma.治疗急性哮喘时持续使用与间歇使用β受体激动剂的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(4):CD001115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001115.
3
6. Asthma.6. 哮喘。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Feb;111(2 Suppl):S502-19. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.94.
4
Randomised pragmatic comparison of UK and US treatment of acute asthma presenting to hospital.英国和美国对住院急性哮喘治疗的随机实用比较。
Thorax. 2002 Dec;57(12):1040-4. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.12.1040.
5
Acute asthma.急性哮喘
BMJ. 2001 Oct 13;323(7317):841-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7317.841.