Della Paschoa O E, Luckow V, Trenk D, Jähnchen E, Santos S R
Department of Pharmacology, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;48(1):45-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00202171.
We studied the use of atrioventricular (AV) conduction time to assess the therapeutic equivalence of two diltiazem formulations in 20 volunteers in a double-blind, cross-over trial. ECG recording was carried out before and at several intervals after drug administration, and prolongation of the PQ interval (delta PQ) was taken as a pharmacodynamic response. In addition, diltiazem plasma concentrations were determined in 8 subjects. The effect of diltiazem increased proportionally with the plasma concentration and could be detected up to 10 h after administration. The area under the effect-time curve (AUEC(0-10)), the peak effect (Emax), and the effect mean residence time (MRTE) showed significant differences. In contrast to the pharmacodynamics, the pharmacokinetic profiles of diltiazem do not vary to the same extent. We conclude that the formulations are therapeutically different. Furthermore, at the administered dose, delta PQ appears to be a sensitive measure for assessing the electrophysiological properties of diltiazem.
我们在一项双盲、交叉试验中,对20名志愿者使用房室(AV)传导时间来评估两种地尔硫䓬制剂的治疗等效性。在给药前及给药后的几个时间点进行心电图记录,并将PQ间期延长(ΔPQ)作为药效学反应。此外,还测定了8名受试者的地尔硫䓬血浆浓度。地尔硫䓬的效应随血浆浓度成比例增加,且在给药后长达10小时均可检测到。效应-时间曲线下面积(AUEC(0-10))、最大效应(Emax)和效应平均驻留时间(MRTE)均显示出显著差异。与药效学不同,地尔硫䓬的药代动力学特征变化程度不同。我们得出结论,这两种制剂在治疗上存在差异。此外,在给药剂量下,ΔPQ似乎是评估地尔硫䓬电生理特性的敏感指标。