• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1992 - 1994年美国医疗保健改革的政治:历史回顾

The politics of health care reform in the United States, 1992-1994: a historical review.

作者信息

Navarro V

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(2):185-201. doi: 10.2190/5GMF-CPYE-N8G4-7HH4.

DOI:10.2190/5GMF-CPYE-N8G4-7HH4
PMID:7622313
Abstract

In an analysis of the sociopolitical context of the debate on health care reform in the United States, the author focuses on the political events that led to the election of a Democratic administration in 1992; the evolution of the White House task force on health care reform and the interests and positions it represented; the connection between economic and political power in the United States; and the reasons for the defeat of the health care reform proposal. This historical analysis questions some of the dominant interpretations of the failure to reform health care, which assume that the U.S. population was not yet ready for these reforms.

摘要

在对美国医疗保健改革辩论的社会政治背景进行分析时,作者关注了导致1992年民主党政府当选的政治事件;白宫医疗保健改革特别工作组的演变及其所代表的利益和立场;美国经济与政治权力之间的联系;以及医疗保健改革提案失败的原因。这种历史分析对一些关于医疗保健改革失败的主流解释提出了质疑,这些解释认为美国民众尚未做好接受这些改革的准备。

相似文献

1
The politics of health care reform in the United States, 1992-1994: a historical review.1992 - 1994年美国医疗保健改革的政治:历史回顾
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(2):185-201. doi: 10.2190/5GMF-CPYE-N8G4-7HH4.
2
Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part III.
Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(1):19-46. doi: 10.2190/E90X-YLKC-B90U-0WYG.
3
Stress fractures.
Natl J (Wash). 1994 Feb 19;26(8):412-7.
4
Interest group politics determines power players in reform debate.利益集团政治决定了改革辩论中的权力参与者。
Health Prog. 1994 Jun;75(5):14-6, 26.
5
The second wave.第二波。
Natl J (Wash). 1994 Oct 15;26(42):2393-7.
6
What is the truth about the health care task force?
J Med Assoc Ga. 1994 Jul;83(7):390.
7
Itching for a fight?
Natl J (Wash). 1994 Jan 15;26(3):106-10.
8
Dealing with the conflict of interests in health care reform.
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1998 Fall;21(2):162-80.
9
Well-healed: inside lobbying for health care reform, Part II. Center for Public Integrity.
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(4):593-632. doi: 10.2190/0LP1-2EAM-3QJM-R8DT.
10
Election 2008 - campaign contributions, lobbying, and the U.S. Health Sector.2008年选举——竞选捐款、游说活动与美国医疗行业
N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):736-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078151.

引用本文的文献

1
The nexus of environmental quality with renewable consumption, immigration, and healthcare in the US: wavelet and gradual-shift causality approaches.美国环境质量与可再生消费、移民和医疗保健的关系:小波和渐进转移因果关系方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Dec;26(34):35208-35217. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06522-y. Epub 2019 Nov 6.