• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国福利供给中准市场的发展。

The development of quasi-markets in welfare provision in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Glennerster H, Le Grand J

机构信息

Welfare State Programme Suntory-Toyota International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines London School of Economics, England.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(2):203-18. doi: 10.2190/GGF3-JQ88-Y5AA-A35D.

DOI:10.2190/GGF3-JQ88-Y5AA-A35D
PMID:7622314
Abstract

In the late 1980s, governments in many western economies began to introduce competition between public agencies providing health, education, and other forms of social welfare. Government became a contracting agency separating funding from provision. The United Kingdom went farthest in legislation passed between 1988 and 1990. The authors review some possible explanations for this fundamental change. The article draws on public choice theory and broader political science approaches and reviews the evidence on the impact of the changes. The gains from these changes may be small, and the result may be only the build up of pressure for more spending in the longer term.

摘要

20世纪80年代末,许多西方经济体的政府开始在提供医疗、教育和其他社会福利形式的公共机构之间引入竞争。政府成为了一个将资金与服务提供分离的签约机构。英国在1988年至1990年间通过的立法中走得最远。作者们审视了这一根本性变化的一些可能解释。本文借鉴了公共选择理论和更广泛的政治学方法,并审视了有关这些变化影响的证据。这些变化带来的收益可能很小,结果可能只是在长期内积累了更多支出的压力。

相似文献

1
The development of quasi-markets in welfare provision in the United Kingdom.英国福利供给中准市场的发展。
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(2):203-18. doi: 10.2190/GGF3-JQ88-Y5AA-A35D.
2
Privatization in health and human services: a critique.卫生与公共服务领域的私有化:一种批判。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 Summer;17(2):233-53. doi: 10.1215/03616878-17-2-233.
3
Where's the benefit?益处何在?
Ment Health Today. 2013 Jan-Feb:8-9.
4
Purchasing of services contracting: a symbiosis of voluntary organizations, government, and clients.服务采购合同:志愿组织、政府与客户的共生关系。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1995 Summer;18(1):104-28.
5
Managing competition in public and private mental health agencies: implications for services and policy.管理公共和私立心理健康机构中的竞争:对服务和政策的影响。
Milbank Q. 1994;72(4):653-78.
6
MPs call for £7bn social care funding increase as "starting point" for reform.议员们呼吁增加70亿英镑的社会护理资金,作为改革的“起点”。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 21;371:m4090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4090.
7
The politics of welfare privatization: the British experience.福利私有化的政治:英国的经验
Int J Health Serv. 1989;19(2):209-20. doi: 10.2190/NGX2-3YK9-CRKU-P4T3.
8
Decision making in quasi-markets: a pedagogic analysis.准市场中的决策:一项教学分析
J Health Econ. 1996 Apr;15(2):187-208. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00037-2.
9
Jubilant?兴高采烈的?
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Mar;65(632):148. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684181.
10
The State and health care reform.国家与医疗保健改革。
N Z Health Hospital. 1992 Jul-Aug;44(4):14-6, 18-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Why the Discretion Mix Matters: Understanding the Transformation of Long-term Care Services.为何审慎组合至关重要:理解长期护理服务的转变
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019871821. doi: 10.1177/0046958019871821.
2
Hospital competition, GP fundholders and waiting times in the UK internal market: the case of elective surgery.英国内部市场中的医院竞争、全科医生基金持有者与候诊时间:择期手术案例
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Mar;3(1):25-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1023219915747.