Murase N, Starzl T E, Tanabe M, Fujisaki S, Miyazawa H, Ye Q, Delaney C P, Fung J J, Demetris A J
Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, USA.
Transplantation. 1995 Jul 27;60(2):158-71. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199507000-00009.
The bidirectional paradigm of tolerance involving reciprocal host vs. graft and graft vs. host reactions was examined after Lewis (LEW)-->Brown Norway (BN) transplantation of different whole organs (liver, intestine, heart, and kidney) or of 2.5 x 10(8) LEW leukocytes obtained from bone marrow, spleen, lymph nodes, and thymus. The experiments were performed without immunosuppression or under 14 daily doses of postoperative tacrolimus, which were continued in weekly doses to 100 days in a "continuous treatment" subgroup, and to 27 days in a short treatment group. Without immunosuppression, all organs and cell suspensions failed to engraft or were acutely rejected. GVHD (usually fatal) was always caused when either the long or short treatment was used for recipients of intestinal grafts and cell suspensions of spleen and lymph nodes. In contrast, both immunosuppressive protocols allowed engraftment of bone marrow cells, liver, heart, and kidney without clinical GVHD, whereas thymus cell suspensions and small doses of whole blood neither engrafted nor caused GVHD. At 100 days, now drug-free for 73 days, the liver, bone marrow, and heart recipients were tolerant in that they accepted all challenge LEW heart and/or liver grafts for 100 more days despite in vitro evidence of donor-specific reactivity (split tolerance). At 200 days, histopathologic studies of the challenge livers were normal no matter what the priming graft. However, the still-beating challenge hearts had a spectrum from normal to severe chronic rejection that defined the tolerogenicity of the original primary grafts: liver best-->bone marrow next-->heart least. Both the GVHD propensity and tolerogenicity in these experiments were closely associated with recipient tissue chimerism 30 and 100 days after the experiments began. The tissue chimerism was invariably multilineage, but the GVHD outcome was associated with T cell over-representation. These observations provide guidelines that should be considered in devising leukocyte augmentation protocols for human whole organ recipients. The results are discussed in relation to the historical tolerance studies of Billingham, Brent, and Medawar; Good; Monaco; and Calne.
在进行不同全器官(肝脏、肠道、心脏和肾脏)的Lewis(LEW)到Brown Norway(BN)移植,或移植从骨髓、脾脏、淋巴结和胸腺获取的2.5×10⁸个LEW白细胞后,研究了涉及宿主与移植物以及移植物与宿主相互反应的双向耐受模式。实验在未进行免疫抑制的情况下进行,或在术后给予14天每日剂量的他克莫司,在“持续治疗”亚组中以每周剂量持续至100天,在短治疗组中持续至27天。在未进行免疫抑制的情况下,所有器官和细胞悬液均未能植入或被急性排斥。当对肠道移植物以及脾脏和淋巴结细胞悬液的受体采用长疗程或短疗程治疗时,总会引发移植物抗宿主病(通常是致命的)。相比之下,两种免疫抑制方案均允许骨髓细胞、肝脏、心脏和肾脏植入且无临床移植物抗宿主病,而胸腺细胞悬液和小剂量全血既未植入也未引发移植物抗宿主病。在100天时,此时已停药73天,肝脏、骨髓和心脏受体具有耐受性,因为尽管体外有供体特异性反应的证据(分离耐受),但他们仍能在接下来的100天内接受所有挑战性的LEW心脏和/或肝脏移植物。在200天时,无论初次植入的移植物是什么,对挑战性肝脏的组织病理学研究均正常。然而,仍在跳动的挑战性心脏存在从正常到严重慢性排斥的一系列情况,这确定了原始初次移植物的致耐受性:肝脏最佳→骨髓次之→心脏最差。在实验开始后30天和100天,这些实验中的移植物抗宿主病倾向和致耐受性均与受体组织嵌合现象密切相关。组织嵌合现象总是多谱系的,但移植物抗宿主病的结果与T细胞过度表现有关。这些观察结果为设计人类全器官受体的白细胞增强方案提供了应考虑的指导原则。将结合Billingham、Brent和Medawar、Good、Monaco以及Calne的历史耐受研究对结果进行讨论。