Nelson E, Rice J, Rochberg N, Endicott J, Coryell W, Akiskal H S
Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995 Mar;91(3):146-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1995.tb09757.x.
As part of the US National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Program on the Psychobiology of Depression study, a subset of 460 randomly chosen relatives of affectively ill probands were compared to a control group matched by the acquaintanceship method. The rate of major affective disorder in relatives was found to be 36%; the rate among controls was 28%. Relatives were also found to have significantly higher rates of bipolar II disorder, any Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) affective disorder and any RDC mental disorder. All of these rates were found to be significantly higher when female relatives were compared with their acquaintances, but only the rate of any RDC mental disorder was higher when this comparison was made in men. The acquaintanceship method enabled the selection of a control group that closely resembled the relatives, probably to the extent of "overmatching". When the match was evaluated to determine whether relatives tended to select comparably ill (or well) acquaintances, this was found to be the case only for alcoholic and never mentally ill relatives.
作为美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症心理生物学合作项目研究的一部分,从460名随机挑选的情感障碍先证者亲属中选取一个子集,与通过相识法匹配的对照组进行比较。亲属中重度情感障碍的发生率为36%;对照组的发生率为28%。还发现亲属中双相II型障碍、任何研究诊断标准(RDC)情感障碍和任何RDC精神障碍的发生率显著更高。当女性亲属与其相识者进行比较时,所有这些发生率都显著更高,但在男性中进行这种比较时,只有任何RDC精神障碍的发生率更高。相识法能够选择一个与亲属非常相似的对照组,可能达到了“过度匹配”的程度。当评估匹配情况以确定亲属是否倾向于选择病情相当(或良好)的相识者时,发现只有酗酒且从未患过精神疾病的亲属才是这种情况。