Andreasen N C, Rice J, Endicott J, Coryell W, Grove W M, Reich T
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 May;44(5):461-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800170083011.
We examined familial rates of affective disorder and related illness in a cohort of 955 probands studied at five centers in the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Study of the Psychobiology of Depression: Boston, Chicago, Iowa City, New York, and St. Louis. Six hundred sixteen of these probands were entered into a family study, and 3423 of their first-degree relatives were evaluated. The probands were divided into five diagnostic groups: schizoaffective-bipolar (n = 37), schizoaffective-depressed (n = 18), bipolar I (n = 151), bipolar II (n = 76), and unipolar (n = 330). The relatives of bipolar I probands had a higher rate of bipolar I illness than the relatives of unipolar probands, but the relatives of unipolar probands did not have a higher rate of unipolar illness than the relatives of bipolar I probands. The relatives of probands with schizoaffective disorder, depressed subtype, had a higher rate of schizophrenia than the relatives of schizoaffective-bipolar probands, suggesting that bipolar schizoaffective disorder may be closer to pure affective disorder while schizoaffective depression may be closer to schizophrenia. An increase in bipolar II illness was also observed in the relatives of bipolar II probands. Overall, these data support the widely accepted distinction between bipolar and unipolar affective disorders.
在国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症心理生物学合作研究的五个中心(波士顿、芝加哥、艾奥瓦城、纽约和圣路易斯)对955名先证者进行了研究,我们调查了情感障碍及相关疾病的家族发病率。其中616名先证者进入家族研究,对他们的3423名一级亲属进行了评估。先证者被分为五个诊断组:分裂情感性障碍-双相型(n = 37)、分裂情感性障碍-抑郁型(n = 18)、双相I型(n = 151)、双相II型(n = 76)和单相型(n = 330)。双相I型先证者的亲属患双相I型疾病的比率高于单相型先证者的亲属,但单相型先证者的亲属患单相疾病的比率并不高于双相I型先证者的亲属。分裂情感性障碍抑郁亚型先证者的亲属患精神分裂症的比率高于分裂情感性障碍双相型先证者的亲属,这表明双相分裂情感性障碍可能更接近纯情感障碍,而分裂情感性抑郁可能更接近精神分裂症。在双相II型先证者的亲属中也观察到双相II型疾病发病率增加。总体而言,这些数据支持了双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍之间被广泛接受的区别。