Byers P H, Ryan P A, Regan M B, Shields A, Carta S G
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 1995 Jul;22(4):187-92. doi: 10.1097/00152192-199507000-00010.
Soap and water and a no-rinse cleanser, with and without a moisture barrier, were examined for their effects as cleansing regimens on the perineal skin of 10 older female residents of an extended care facility. Each cleansing regimen was used for 3 weeks, with two weekly measurements obtained for erythema, pH, and transepidermal water loss. Results indicated that soap and water was the least efficacious regimen unless used with a moisture barrier. The no-rinse cleanser was better than soap and water in terms of skin effects and cost savings. The findings suggest that a no-rinse cleanser in conjunction with a moisture barrier is a more skin-preserving and cost-effective incontinence care cleansing regimen than soap and water for older female nursing home residents with incontinence.
研究人员对肥皂和水以及免冲洗清洁剂（有无保湿屏障）作为清洁方案对一家长期护理机构中10名老年女性居民会阴部皮肤的影响进行了研究。每种清洁方案使用3周，每周测量两次红斑、pH值和经表皮水分流失情况。结果表明，除非使用保湿屏障，肥皂和水是效果最差的清洁方案。就皮肤效果和成本节约而言，免冲洗清洁剂优于肥皂和水。研究结果表明，对于患有失禁问题的老年女性养老院居民，与肥皂和水相比，使用带有保湿屏障的免冲洗清洁剂是一种更能保护皮肤且具成本效益的失禁护理清洁方案。
