Oades R D, Dittmann-Balcar A, Zerbin D
RLHK Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Essen, Germany.
Int J Neurosci. 1995 Apr;81(3-4):265-81. doi: 10.3109/00207459509004891.
Five components were studied in 4 subtraction waveforms derived from ERPs obtained in passive and active conditions of a 3-tone oddball task (common = 70%, C, 0.8 KHz; deviant = 15%, D, 2 KHz; 1.4 KHz = 15%, t, also used as a target (T)). These waveforms reflect different stimulus-mismatch processes and thus their topography could be revealing of different brain regions mediating them. The following mismatches were studied: stimulus-mismatch (deviant--common, D/C, rarity and pitch confounded), pitch-mismatch (T--deviant, T/D, rarity not target features controlled), attention-mismatch (T-t), T/t, controlled for pitch and rarity to show the influence of target features). These are compared with Goodin's procedure [G-wv, (T--common (active))--(t--common (passive))]. There were main site effects in normalized data in all cases (not P2 and N2 latency). There were separate frontal and posterior contributions to P1, with the former emphasized where target comparisons were involved. Frontal N1 peaks, largest in D/C, spread posterior and to the right where target matching was involved. P2 posterior maxima were also less localized where target features were involved in the comparison. N2 topography was similar between waveforms but spread slightly more to each side in the T/t comparison. Onset was earlier in the D/C comparison. Parietal P3 peaks in waves based on target-ERPs showed a left temporal shift (vs D/C), though in T/D P3 was in fact maximal on the right. Thus an attentional effect is evident as early as 60 ms. Target features modify the anteroposterior distribution of positivity and negativity for the early components and in the lateralization of P3-like positivity. A comparison of waveforms by latency of potential shift (running t-test) vs peak identification (MANOVA) is illustrated and discussed. D/C and T/t (rather than T/D or G-wv) waveforms are recommended for distinguishing comparator mechanisms for stimulus- and task-relevant features.
在一个三音奇偶数任务的被动和主动条件下获得的事件相关电位(ERP)衍生出的4个减法波形中,研究了5个成分(常见音 = 70%,C,0.8千赫兹;偏差音 = 15%,D,2千赫兹;1.4千赫兹 = 15%,t,也用作目标音(T))。这些波形反映了不同的刺激不匹配过程,因此它们的地形图可能揭示介导这些过程的不同脑区。研究了以下不匹配情况:刺激不匹配(偏差音 - 常见音,D/C,稀有性和音高混淆)、音高不匹配(T - 偏差音,T/D,控制稀有性而非目标特征)、注意不匹配(T - t),T/t,控制音高和稀有性以显示目标特征的影响)。将这些与古丁的程序[G - wv,(T - 常见音(主动)) - (t - 常见音(被动))]进行比较。在所有情况下,标准化数据中都存在主要的部位效应(不是P2和N2潜伏期)。P1有单独的额叶和后部贡献,在涉及目标比较的情况下前者更为突出。额叶N1峰值在D/C中最大,在涉及目标匹配时向后部和右侧扩展。在比较中涉及目标特征时,P2后部最大值的定位也较差。波形之间的N2地形图相似,但在T/t比较中向两侧的扩展略多。D/C比较中的起始时间更早。基于目标ERP的波形中的顶叶P3峰值显示出左颞叶移位(与D/C相比),尽管在T/D中P3实际上在右侧最大。因此,早在60毫秒时注意效应就很明显。目标特征改变了早期成分的正负性前后分布以及类似P3正性的侧化。说明了并讨论了通过电位移位潜伏期(连续t检验)与峰值识别(多变量方差分析)对波形进行的比较。推荐使用D/C和T/t(而非T/D或G - wv)波形来区分刺激和任务相关特征的比较机制。