Suppr超能文献

一种预测头颈外科手术输血需求的模型。

A model for predicting transfusion requirements in head and neck surgery.

作者信息

Weber R S

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 1995 Aug;105(8 Pt 2 Suppl 73):1-17. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199508001-00001.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although allogeneic blood transfusions have allowed surgeons increased latitude in resecting advanced cancers, they can cause significant morbidity or even death in rare instances. Potential side effects may include transmission of infection and immunosuppression leading to an increased risk of cancer recurrence. Because patients have become more reluctant to receive transfusions, they frequently request preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD). In practice, however, only 50% or less of the donated blood is ultimately transfused while the remainder is discarded.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a transfusion prediction and risk assessment (TPRA) model for predicting the need for perioperative blood transfusions in patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic surgical procedures. By knowing the probability for blood transfusion, the physician and patient can make an educated decision regarding the need for PABD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a 4-year period, 436 patients underwent major head and neck surgical procedures for neoplasms of the upper aerodigestive tract, the thyroid gland, and the salivary glands. Data obtained prospectively on each patient included age and gender, the TNM stage, primary disease site, type of prior treatment, estimated intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, transfusion requirements, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, type of procedure and method of reconstruction. These variables were examined singly and in combination both for descriptive purposes and to evaluate their interrelationships. In order to develop the TPRA model, only the 12 variables available prior to the surgical procedure were examined. Variables associated with transfusion need were evaluated further in a multivariate analysis. The logistic regression model allowed a linear expression of patient characteristics to be related to a function of the probability of transfusion need. Analyses of association between categorical variables and transfusion status were based on chi-squared, Fisher's Exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

Overall, 51 (11.7%) patients required blood transfusions. The median number of units transfused was 2.0 (range, 1 to 13 U). Univariate analysis demonstrated a higher probability for blood replacement in patients with oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal primary tumor sites, a preoperative hemoglobin level below normal, prior chemotherapy, composite resection, flap reconstruction, between 50 and 59 years of age, and T3 or T4 tumor stage. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the need for flap reconstruction, a preoperative hemoglobin below the normal level, and T3 or T4 primary stage were the three factors most significantly associated with the need for transfusion (P < .03). Based on eight combinations of these three variables, transfusion risk predictions were obtained. The TPRA model predicted that patients with a normal hemoglobin level who did not require flap reconstruction and did not have either a T3 or T4 primary stage tumor had the lowest probability (.02) for requiring blood transfusion. Patients at highest risk (.65) were those with less than a normal hemoglobin level, who required flap reconstruction, and had T3 or T4 primary tumor stage. Based on the TPRA model, an algorithm was developed which could serve as a guideline for preoperative transfusion planning.

CONCLUSION

By using the TPRA model to change guidelines for preoperative transfusion planning, costs can theoretically be reduced by 50% without significantly increasing the risk of exposing patients to allogeneic blood transfusion. If the TPRA model proves accurate in a follow-up study to test its validity, it may have clinical utility for aiding the surgeon in more cost-effective transfusion planning.

摘要

引言

尽管同种异体输血使外科医生在切除晚期癌症时有了更大的操作空间,但在极少数情况下,它可能会导致严重的发病甚至死亡。潜在的副作用可能包括感染传播和免疫抑制,从而增加癌症复发的风险。由于患者越来越不愿意接受输血,他们经常要求进行术前自体输血(PABD)。然而,在实际操作中,最终只有50%或更少的捐献血液被输注,其余的则被丢弃。

目的

本研究的目的是开发一种输血预测和风险评估(TPRA)模型,用于预测接受主要头颈肿瘤外科手术的患者围手术期输血的需求。通过了解输血的可能性,医生和患者可以就是否需要进行术前自体输血做出明智的决定。

患者和方法

在4年的时间里,436例患者接受了针对上呼吸道消化道、甲状腺和唾液腺肿瘤的主要头颈外科手术。前瞻性收集的每位患者的数据包括年龄和性别、TNM分期、原发疾病部位、既往治疗类型、估计术中失血量、手术持续时间、输血需求、术前和术后血红蛋白及血细胞比容水平、手术类型和重建方法。对这些变量进行了单独和综合检查,以进行描述并评估它们之间的相互关系。为了开发TPRA模型,仅检查了手术前可用的12个变量。在多变量分析中进一步评估了与输血需求相关的变量。逻辑回归模型允许将患者特征的线性表达式与输血需求概率的函数相关联。分类变量与输血状态之间的关联分析基于卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。

结果

总体而言,51例(11.7%)患者需要输血。输注单位的中位数为2.0(范围,1至13单位)。单变量分析表明,口咽或下咽原发肿瘤部位、术前血红蛋白水平低于正常、既往化疗、联合切除、皮瓣重建、年龄在50至59岁之间以及T3或T4肿瘤分期的患者输血的可能性更高。逻辑回归分析表明,皮瓣重建的需求、术前血红蛋白低于正常水平以及T3或T4原发分期是与输血需求最显著相关的三个因素(P <.03)。基于这三个变量的八种组合,获得了输血风险预测。TPRA模型预测,血红蛋白水平正常、不需要皮瓣重建且没有T3或T4原发分期肿瘤的患者输血的可能性最低(.02)。风险最高(.65)的患者是那些血红蛋白水平低于正常、需要皮瓣重建且有T3或T4原发肿瘤分期的患者。基于TPRA模型,开发了一种算法,可作为术前输血计划的指南。

结论

通过使用TPRA模型来改变术前输血计划的指南,理论上可以将成本降低50%,而不会显著增加患者接受同种异体输血的风险。如果TPRA模型在后续研究中被证明准确有效,它可能在帮助外科医生进行更具成本效益的输血计划方面具有临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验