Korenbrot C C, Gill A, Clayson Z, Patterson E
University of California, School of Medicine, San Francisco 94109, USA.
Public Health Rep. 1995 Mar-Apr;110(2):125-33.
The authors evaluated enhanced perinatal services developed by public health specialists that were implemented statewide through specially certified Medicaid providers to find out whether they were as effective as those services originally tested in the public health agency's pilot project, and more effective than services from regular Medicaid providers. Multivariate logistic regression analyses yielded adjusted odds ratios of use of care and health outcome measures for the statewide services compared with both the pilot project and routine Medicaid care. Although women receiving the enhanced services implemented statewide did not return for prenatal visits as well as those in the pilot project, they did better than women with routine Medicaid providers. Women who kept at least the eight prenatal visits recommended by the Public Health Service in 1989 had risks of low weight births no different from those in the pilot project and significantly better than those for women with at least eight visits with routine Medicaid providers (adjusted odds ratio 0.70 with a 95 percent confidence interval from 0.54 to 0.91). Thus, there is evidence for the efficacy of the services, but additional improvement could be realized through improving the use of care.
作者评估了由公共卫生专家开发的强化围产期服务,这些服务通过经过特别认证的医疗补助提供者在全州范围内实施,以确定它们是否与最初在公共卫生机构试点项目中测试的服务一样有效,以及是否比常规医疗补助提供者提供的服务更有效。多变量逻辑回归分析得出了全州范围服务与试点项目和常规医疗补助护理相比的护理使用和健康结果指标的调整优势比。尽管在全州范围内接受强化服务的女性没有像试点项目中的女性那样按时进行产前检查,但她们的情况比有常规医疗补助提供者的女性要好。在1989年至少进行了公共卫生服务建议的八次产前检查的女性,低体重儿出生风险与试点项目中的女性没有差异,且明显优于至少进行八次常规医疗补助提供者产前检查的女性(调整优势比为0.70,95%置信区间为0.54至0.91)。因此,有证据表明这些服务是有效的,但通过改善护理的使用可以实现进一步的改进。