Suppr超能文献

对于接受根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术的患者,急性等容血液稀释是一种比术前自体献血更具成本效益的替代方法。

Acute normovolemic hemodilution is a cost-effective alternative to preoperative autologous blood donation by patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

作者信息

Monk T G, Goodnough L T, Birkmeyer J D, Brecher M E, Catalona W J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1995 Jul;35(7):559-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35795357877.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative autologous blood donation is accepted as a standard of care for radical prostatectomy. Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is an alternative method for obtaining autologous blood. The cost and benefits of these two autologous blood-collection techniques are compared.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy underwent ANH to a target hematocrit level of 28 percent. Blood was transfused in the perioperative period to maintain the hematocrit level > 25 percent. Hematocrit levels, transfusion outcomes and costs, and postoperative outcomes for these patients (hemodilution group) were compared with a matched patient cohort who preoperatively donated 3 units of blood for autologous use in prostatectomy surgery (nonhemodilution group, n = 30).

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent ANH to a hematocrit level of 28.7 +/- 1.7 percent, and 1740 +/- 346 mL (3.5 +/- 0.7 units) of blood were collected. Three (10%) of the patients in each cohort had allogeneic blood exposure. Transfusion costs were 73 percent higher for the nonhemodilution group patients than for the hemodilution group patients ($330 +/- $100 vs. $191 +/- $55, p < 0.001). No differences were found in postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

An integrated blood conservation program utilizing hemodilution and a defined transfusion trigger can decrease the requirement for preoperative donation of blood for autologous use in radical prostatectomy. Point-of-care autologous blood procurement is more cost-effective than preadmission donation of autologous blood units.

摘要

背景

术前自体血捐献被视为根治性前列腺切除术的标准治疗方法。急性等容血液稀释(ANH)是获取自体血的另一种方法。对这两种自体血采集技术的成本和效益进行比较。

研究设计与方法

连续30例计划行根治性前列腺切除术的患者接受ANH,使血细胞比容达到目标水平28%。围手术期输血以维持血细胞比容水平>25%。将这些患者(血液稀释组)的血细胞比容水平、输血结果及成本以及术后结果与一组匹配患者队列(非血液稀释组,n = 30)进行比较,该队列患者术前捐献3单位自体血用于前列腺切除术。

结果

30例患者接受ANH,血细胞比容达到28.7±1.7%,采集血液1740±346 mL(3.5±0.7单位)。每个队列中有3例(10%)患者接受了异体血输注。非血液稀释组患者的输血成本比血液稀释组患者高73%(330±100美元对191±55美元,p < 0.001)。术后结果未发现差异。

结论

采用血液稀释和明确输血触发点的综合血液保护方案可减少根治性前列腺切除术中术前自体血捐献的需求。即时自体血采集比术前预先捐献自体血单位更具成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验