Suppr超能文献

急性等容血液稀释可替代术前自体血捐献,作为根治性前列腺切除术中自体血采集的标准治疗方法。

Acute normovolemic hemodilution can replace preoperative autologous blood donation as a standard of care for autologous blood procurement in radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Monk T G, Goodnough L T, Brecher M E, Pulley D D, Colberg J W, Andriole G L, Catalona W J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1997 Nov;85(5):953-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199711000-00001.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Predonation of autologous blood (PAD) is a standard of care for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, but recent studies have shown that PAD is not cost-effective. Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is an alternative autologous blood procurement technique that is much less costly than PAD. We compared the efficacy and costs of ANH alone to ANH combined with PAD. Two hundred-fifty patients who predonated fewer than 3 units of autologous blood before radical prostatectomy underwent ANH to a target hematocrit of 28%. Perioperative hematocrit levels, transfusion outcomes and costs, and postoperative outcomes were compared for patients who predonated 0, 1, or 2 units of blood before surgery. A computer model was used to estimate the savings in red blood cells (RBC) associated with each autologous intervention. ANH alone resulted in a 21% allogeneic transfusion rate and contributed a mean net savings of 112 mL RBC in blood conservation (equivalent to 0.6 unit of blood). The addition of 1 or 2 units of PAD reduced allogeneic exposure rates to 6% or 0%, respectively. Overall, patients who predonated blood had a mean net loss of 198 mL of RBC (equivalent to 1 blood unit), due to both an absence in compensatory erythropoiesis and to the wastage of 60% of the blood units donated. Patients who underwent ANH alone had a 60% reduction in mean total transfusion costs ($103 +/- $102) compared with patients who predeposited 2 units of autologous blood in addition to ANH ($269 +/- $11, P < 0.05). We conclude that ANH can replace PAD as an autologous blood option because it is less costly and equally effective. A combination of ANH and PAD can further decrease allogeneic blood exposure, but it increases transfusion costs and wastage.

IMPLICATIONS

A patient's own blood can be obtained for use in surgery by predonation or acute normovolemic hemodilution on the day of surgery. Both blood collection techniques decrease the need for blood bank transfusions, but acute normovolemic hemodilution is less expensive and more convenient for patients.

摘要

未标注

自体血预存(PAD)是根治性前列腺切除术患者的一种标准治疗方式,但近期研究表明,PAD并不具有成本效益。急性等容血液稀释(ANH)是一种替代性自体血采集技术,其成本远低于PAD。我们比较了单纯ANH与ANH联合PAD的疗效和成本。250例在根治性前列腺切除术前行自体血预存少于3单位的患者接受ANH,使血细胞比容达到目标值28%。比较了术前预存0、1或2单位血液的患者的围手术期血细胞比容水平、输血结果及成本以及术后结果。使用计算机模型估计每种自体干预措施相关的红细胞(RBC)节约量。单纯ANH导致异体输血率为21%,在血液保护方面平均净节约112 mL RBC(相当于0.6单位血液)。添加1或2单位PAD分别将异体血暴露率降至6%或0%。总体而言,由于缺乏代偿性红细胞生成以及所捐献血液单位的60%被浪费,预存血液的患者RBC平均净损失198 mL(相当于1单位血液)。与除ANH外还预存2单位自体血的患者相比,单纯接受ANH的患者平均总输血成本降低了60%(103±102美元 vs $269±11美元,P<0.05)。我们得出结论,ANH可替代PAD作为自体血选择,因为其成本更低且效果相同。ANH与PAD联合使用可进一步降低异体血暴露,但会增加输血成本和浪费。

启示

可通过预存或手术当日急性等容血液稀释获取患者自身血液用于手术。两种采血技术均减少了对血库输血的需求,但急性等容血液稀释对患者而言成本更低且更方便。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验