Mais D E, Hayes J S, Heap R B, Wang M W
Department of Pharmacology, Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995 Jul;54(1-2):63-9. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00120-o.
This structure-activity study compares the affinity of a series of progestins, progesterone metabolites and anti-progestins for a panel of monoclonal antibodies to progesterone, coypu (Myocastor coypus) or guinea pig plasma progesterone-binding proteins (PPBPs) and the human recombinant progesterone receptor A form (PR-A). The compounds tested were progesterone, Promegestone (R5020), Mifepristone (RU486), ZK98,734, Onapristone (ZK98,299), 11 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, 11 alpha-progesterone hemisuccinate, androsterone, etiocholanolone, 5 alpha- and 5 beta-pregnane-3,20-diones, and 20 alpha- and 20 beta-hydroxyprogesterones. The Ki values for these ligands were determined by competitive binding assays using radiolabelled progesterone as the binding site ligand. For anti-progesterone antibodies (e.g. DB3 and 11/32), only progesterone (3.6-8.8 nM), the 11 alpha-derivatives (1.0-5.5 nM) used to prepare the immunogen and the two 5-pregnanediones (20.9-45.1 nM) were bound with high affinity. For PR-A, high affinity binding was found with receptor agonists (Ki = 1.1-6.2 nM), both 5- and 20-reduced metabolites, and antagonists (0.6-28.0 nM), but not with the 11 alpha-derivatives (950 nM-1.0 microM). In contrast, the PPBPs displayed high affinity interactions with progesterone (3.5-4.2 nM) and both 5 alpha- and 20 alpha-reduced metabolites (2.4-3.4 nM). Binding with the beta-isomers and R5020 was less pronounced (22-170 nM) and there was no evidence of high affinity binding with PR antagonists (> 1.0 microM). Analogs with the 17-keto group did not bind to any of the binders studied. Thus, commonalities among the three types of protein binders were their comparable binding affinities for progesterone (3.5-8.8 nM) and 5-pregnanedione isomers (2.4-330 nM), and a lack of binding for two C17-keto steroids (androsterone and etiocholanolone). The results imply that the tertiary features of the binding domain of these three types of proteins are sufficiently different to result in unique binding structures.
本构效关系研究比较了一系列孕激素、孕酮代谢物和抗孕激素与一组针对孕酮、河狸鼠(Myocastor coypus)或豚鼠血浆孕酮结合蛋白(PPBP)的单克隆抗体以及人重组孕酮受体A亚型(PR-A)的亲和力。所测试的化合物有孕酮、普美孕酮(R5020)、米非司酮(RU486)、ZK98734、奥那司酮(ZK98299)、11α-羟基孕酮、11α-孕酮半琥珀酸酯、雄甾酮、本胆烷醇酮、5α-和5β-孕烷-3,20-二酮以及20α-和20β-羟基孕酮。这些配体的Ki值通过使用放射性标记的孕酮作为结合位点配体的竞争性结合试验来确定。对于抗孕酮抗体(如DB3和11/32),只有孕酮(3.6 - 8.8 nM)、用于制备免疫原的11α-衍生物(1.0 - 5.5 nM)以及两种5-孕烷二酮(20.9 - 45.1 nM)以高亲和力结合。对于PR-A,发现受体激动剂(Ki = 1.1 - 6.2 nM)、5-和20-还原代谢物以及拮抗剂(0.6 - 28.0 nM)具有高亲和力结合,但11α-衍生物(950 nM - 1.0 μM)则不然。相比之下,PPBP与孕酮(3.5 - 4.2 nM)以及5α-和20α-还原代谢物(2.4 - 3.4 nM)均表现出高亲和力相互作用。与β-异构体和R5020的结合则较弱(22 - 170 nM),且没有证据表明与PR拮抗剂存在高亲和力结合(> 1.0 μM)。具有17-酮基的类似物与所研究的任何一种结合蛋白均不结合。因此,这三种类型的蛋白结合剂的共同之处在于它们对孕酮(3.5 - 8.8 nM)和5-孕烷二酮异构体(2.4 - 330 nM)具有相当的结合亲和力,且对两种C17-酮甾体(雄甾酮和本胆烷醇酮)不结合。结果表明,这三种类型蛋白的结合结构域的三级特征差异足够大,从而导致独特的结合结构。