Stasi R, Taylor C G, Venditti A, Del Poeta G, Aronica G, Bastianelli C, Simone M D, Buccisano F, Cox M C, Bruno A
Chair of Hematology, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, S. Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Ann Hematol. 1995 Jul;71(1):13-27. doi: 10.1007/BF01696228.
Diagnostic accuracy in acute leukemia (AL) can be improved if traditional morphology and cytochemistry are supplemented with immunophenotypic and genotypic analyses. This multiparameter approach is of crucial importance for the management of patients, as it enables the identification of leukemic syndromes with distinct biological features and response to treatment. Immunophenotyping using monoclonal antibodies has been universally accepted as a useful adjunct to morphological criteria. This technique is particularly valuable in diagnosing and subclassifying acute lymphoblastic leukemia and is also essential in certain types of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), such as AML with minimal differentiation or acute megakaryoblastic leukemia. Cytogenetic findings can be quite helpful in establishing the correct diagnosis and can add information of prognostic significance. A number of specific chromosomal abnormalities have been recognized that are very closely, and sometimes uniquely, associated with morphologically and clinically distinct subsets of leukemia. An even more basic understanding of normal and malignant hematopoietic cells has begun to evolve as molecular biology begins to unravel gene misprogramming by Southern and Northern blot analysis, the polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. With the extensive use of these techniques it has become apparent that a proportion of leukemias exhibit the biologically relevant molecular defect in the absence of a karyotypic equivalent. On the other hand, apparently uniform chromosomal abnormalities such as the t(1;19) (q23;p13), t(9;22) (q33;q11), t(8;14) (q24;q32), or t(15;17) (q21;q21) may differ at the molecular level. Data collected from these modern technologies have introduced a greater complexity, which needs to be taken into consideration to improve both the diagnostic precision and the reproducibility of current classifications.
如果传统形态学和细胞化学检查辅以免疫表型和基因分型分析,急性白血病(AL)的诊断准确性可得到提高。这种多参数方法对患者的治疗管理至关重要,因为它能够识别具有不同生物学特征和对治疗反应的白血病综合征。使用单克隆抗体进行免疫表型分析已被普遍认为是形态学标准的有用辅助手段。该技术在急性淋巴细胞白血病的诊断和亚分类中特别有价值,在某些类型的急性髓系白血病(AML)中也必不可少,如分化极小的AML或急性巨核细胞白血病。细胞遗传学结果对确立正确诊断非常有帮助,并且可以提供具有预后意义的信息。已经识别出一些特定的染色体异常,它们与形态学和临床上不同的白血病亚群密切相关,有时甚至是独特相关。随着分子生物学通过Southern和Northern印迹分析、聚合酶链反应和荧光原位杂交开始揭示基因编程错误,对正常和恶性造血细胞的更基本理解也开始发展。随着这些技术的广泛应用,很明显一部分白血病在没有核型等效物的情况下表现出生物学相关的分子缺陷。另一方面,明显一致的染色体异常,如t(1;19)(q23;p13)、t(9;22)(q33;q11)、t(8;14)(q24;q32)或t(15;17)(q21;q21)在分子水平上可能存在差异。从这些现代技术收集的数据引入了更大的复杂性,为提高当前分类的诊断精度和可重复性,需要考虑这些因素。