• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[依据良好临床实践质量指南开展的麻醉学临床随机对照研究。2:实施、分析、发表及评估原则]

[Clinical randomized controlled studies in anesthesiology according to quality guidelines of good clinical practice. 2: Principles of implementation, analysis, publication and evaluation].

作者信息

Bothner U, Seeling W, Schwilk B, Pfenninger E, Georgieff M

机构信息

Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum der Universität Ulm.

出版信息

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1995 Jun;30(4):220-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996479.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-996479
PMID:7632855
Abstract

This article was written to give researchers and clinicians a short synopsis of ethical and thorough design, conduct, analysis, publication, and interpretation of randomised controlled clinical trials according to the European quality standards of Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The paper consists of two parts. In the first part we introduce important elements of study design, especially study hypothesis, criteria of inclusion and study population, sample size calculation, validity considerations, bias and confounding, randomisation, stratification, and masking of treatment assignment. Different treatment allocation like multiple parallel groups, factorial experiment, cross-over, and sequential design are presented. Requirements of ethical standards according to the Declaration of Helsinki are discussed for their necessity in any experimentation in humans. Principles of informed consent are demonstrated with emphasis on special conditions in anaesthesia, emergency medicine, and intensive care research. In the second part of this article we explain issues of baseline assessment, experimental intervention, data recording, and data monitoring, particularly of negative or hazardous treatment effects. Topics of data analysis and reporting of trial results in publications are illustrated with regard to their influence on subsequent interpretation.

摘要

本文旨在根据欧洲药品临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)的质量标准,为研究人员和临床医生提供一份关于随机对照临床试验的伦理及全面设计、实施、分析、发表和解读的简短概述。本文分为两部分。在第一部分中,我们介绍研究设计的重要要素,特别是研究假设、纳入标准和研究人群、样本量计算、有效性考量、偏倚和混杂因素、随机化、分层以及治疗分配的设盲。还介绍了不同的治疗分配方式,如多个平行组、析因试验、交叉试验和序贯设计。讨论了《赫尔辛基宣言》中伦理标准的要求在任何人体实验中的必要性。阐述了知情同意原则,重点强调了麻醉、急诊医学和重症监护研究中的特殊情况。在本文的第二部分,我们解释基线评估、实验干预、数据记录和数据监测等问题,特别是关于负面或有害治疗效果的问题。阐述了数据分析主题以及出版物中试验结果的报告对后续解读的影响。

相似文献

1
[Clinical randomized controlled studies in anesthesiology according to quality guidelines of good clinical practice. 2: Principles of implementation, analysis, publication and evaluation].[依据良好临床实践质量指南开展的麻醉学临床随机对照研究。2:实施、分析、发表及评估原则]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1995 Jun;30(4):220-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996479.
2
[Clinical randomized controlled studies in anesthesiology according to the quality guidelines of good clinical practice. 1: Basic trial design].
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1995 May;30(3):146-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996464.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
[CONSORT--what a proper scientific publication should supply].[CONSORT——一份恰当的科学出版物应提供的内容]
Med Klin (Munich). 2000 May;95(1 Spec No):91-7.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.对泌尿外科文献中随机对照试验报告质量的批判性评估。
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.027.
7
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
8
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.2000年至2006年普通麻醉学杂志随机对照试验质量的改善:一项为期6年的随访研究。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1916-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819fe6d7.
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites.美国临床肿瘤学会关于临床试验场所最低标准和示范属性的声明。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2562-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6398. Epub 2008 Apr 7.