• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于膝关节融合术的单平面和双平面外固定器。

Single plane and biplane external fixators for knee arthrodesis.

作者信息

Hak D J, Lieberman J R, Finerman G A

机构信息

University of California Los Angeles, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jul(316):134-44.

PMID:7634697
Abstract

Thirty-six knee arthrodeses performed using an external fixator with an average followup of 48 months were reviewed retrospectively. A single plane fixator was used in 19 cases and a biplane fixator in 17 cases. The reasons for fusion included an infected total knee arthroplasty (21 cases), aseptic loosening of a total knee arthroplasty (9 cases), posttraumatic osteoarthritis (3 cases), and a neuropathic joint, an infected unicondylar knee arthroplasty, and a tuberculous joint (1 case each). A fusion was obtained after the initial procedure in 22 patients (61%). With additional procedures, a fusion was obtained eventually in 27 patients (75%). The fusion rate decreased with an increasing number of prior knee procedures. Single and biplane external fixator designs had similar initial fusion rates (single 58%, biplane 65%). Complications included 14 nonunions (5 fused with additional procedures), 6 pin tract infections, 5 delayed unions, 1 stress fracture through a pin site, and 1 persistent infection resulting in an above-knee amputation. Despite biomechanical advances in external fixator design, knee arthrodesis remains difficult to achieve in patients who have had multiple previous procedures, a failed total knee arthroplasty, or an infected total knee arthroplasty with significant bone loss.

摘要

回顾性分析了36例采用外固定器进行膝关节融合术的病例,平均随访时间为48个月。19例使用单平面固定器,17例使用双平面固定器。融合的原因包括感染性全膝关节置换术(21例)、全膝关节置换术无菌性松动(9例)、创伤后骨关节炎(3例)以及神经性关节、感染性单髁膝关节置换术和结核性关节(各1例)。22例患者(61%)在初次手术后获得融合。经过额外手术,最终27例患者(75%)获得融合。融合率随着先前膝关节手术次数的增加而降低。单平面和双平面外固定器设计的初始融合率相似(单平面58%,双平面65%)。并发症包括14例骨不连(5例经额外手术融合)、6例针道感染、5例延迟愈合、1例通过针道的应力性骨折以及1例持续性感染导致膝上截肢。尽管外固定器设计在生物力学方面取得了进展,但对于先前接受过多次手术、全膝关节置换失败或伴有严重骨丢失的感染性全膝关节置换患者,膝关节融合术仍难以实现。

相似文献

1
Single plane and biplane external fixators for knee arthrodesis.用于膝关节融合术的单平面和双平面外固定器。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jul(316):134-44.
2
Knee arthrodesis in the treatment of failed total knee replacement.膝关节融合术治疗全膝关节置换失败
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec(321):138-44.
3
An original knee arthrodesis technique combining external fixator with Steinman pins direct fixation.一种结合外固定架和斯氏针直接固定的原创膝关节融合技术。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun;95(4):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 26.
4
[Knee arthrodesis with external ring fixator after infected knee arthroplasty].感染性膝关节置换术后应用外固定架行膝关节融合术
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Aug 29;167(35):3295-6.
5
Knee arthrodesis with the Sheffield external ring fixator: fusion in 6 of 10 consecutive patients.使用谢菲尔德外固定环进行膝关节融合术:连续10例患者中有6例实现融合。
Acta Orthop. 2007 Jun;78(3):371-6. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013951.
6
[Arthrodesis following revision of a knee endoprosthesis. Literature review 1984-1994].[膝关节假体翻修术后的关节融合术。1984 - 1994年文献综述]
Orthopade. 1996 Apr;25(2):153-7.
7
A comparison of two techniques for knee arthrodesis: the custom made intramedullary Mayday nail versus a monoaxial external fixator.两种膝关节融合术技术的比较:定制髓内“求救”钉与单轴外固定器。
Knee. 2008 Aug;15(4):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
8
[Our experience with revision total knee arthroplasty].[我们在全膝关节置换翻修术中的经验]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(1):6-15.
9
[Arthrodesis following knee arthroplasty].
Orthopade. 1987 Aug;16(4):301-9.
10
Knee Arthrodesis in Persistently Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.持续性感染的全膝关节置换术中的膝关节融合术
J Knee Surg. 2016 Oct;29(7):580-588. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569479. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Fusion rate of 89% after knee arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail: a mono-centric retrospective review of 48 cases.膝关节融合术后采用髓内钉固定的融合率为 89%:单中心回顾性研究 48 例。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Apr;31(4):1299-1306. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06693-7. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
2
Knee Arthrodesis With an Intramedullary Antegrade Rod as a Salvage Procedure for the Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.髓内顺行杆膝关节融合术治疗慢性感染全膝关节置换术后感染
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Sep;4(9):e20.00082-6. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00082.
3
Re-infection rates and clinical outcomes following arthrodesis with intramedullary nail and external fixator for infected knee prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
髓内钉与外固定架治疗感染性膝关节假体融合术后的再感染率及临床结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2283-4.
4
Knee arthrodesis with a long intramedullary nail as limb salvage for complex periprosthetic infections.使用长髓内钉进行膝关节融合术作为肢体挽救手段治疗复杂的假体周围感染。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Dec;26(8):907-914. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1827-2. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
5
The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results.用于膝关节融合的SIGN钉:技术与临床结果
SICOT J. 2016 Feb 5;2:6. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2015038.
6
Knee arthrodesis with modular nail after failed TKA due to infection.因感染导致全膝关节置换术失败后采用模块化髓内钉行膝关节融合术。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Dec;25(8):1307-12. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1707-1. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
Knee arthrodesis using a unilateral external fixator combined with crossed cannulated screws for the treatment of end-stage tuberculosis of the knee.采用单侧外固定器联合交叉空心螺钉行膝关节融合术治疗膝关节终末期结核。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Aug 19;16:197. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0667-2.
8
Arthrodesis of the knee following failed arthroplasty.关节置换失败后的膝关节融合术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1940-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2539-3. Epub 2013 May 26.
9
Is there a role for knee arthrodesis with modular endoprostheses for tumor and revision of failed endoprostheses?对于肿瘤患者和失败的内植物翻修患者,采用模块化假体的膝关节融合术是否有作用?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3326-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3067-7. Epub 2013 May 18.
10
Better function for fusions versus above-the-knee amputations for recurrent periprosthetic knee infection.对于复发性假体膝关节感染,融合术优于膝上截肢术,功能更好。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct;470(10):2737-45. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2322-7.