Argyros G J, Roach J M, Hurwitz K M, Eliasson A H, Phillips Y Y
Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001, USA.
Chest. 1995 Aug;108(2):419-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.2.419.
To evaluate whether there is a refractory period (RP) after hyperventilation challenge, we compared the bronchoconstrictive response to repetitive eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation challenge with dry, room temperature air (EVH). The serial challenges were identical with 11 known asthmatics hyperventilating for 6 min at a target minute ventilation of 30 times their FEV1 measured before either challenge. There was a significant difference between the mean postchallenge fall in FEV1 to the initial EVH challenge (27.4 +/- 9.8%) and the response to the second EVH challenge (16.1 +/- 5.9%) (p = 0.0001), indicating refractoriness. We then evaluated whether 6 min of uninterrupted EVH challenge gives a similar bronchospastic response to that which results from an equivalent (by total minute ventilation) interrupted challenge of 2 min of EVH repeated three times. The mean post-challenge fall in FEV1 in response to this interrupted challenge was 18.9 +/- 10.6%, which was significantly different from the 27.4% fall in response to 6 consecutive minutes of EVH (p = 0.036). This study demonstrates that there is a refractory period after repeated EVH challenges and this refractoriness affects the response to interrupted, or dosed, EVH challenge.
为了评估过度通气激发试验后是否存在不应期(RP),我们比较了对使用干燥、室温空气进行的重复性等碳酸自主过度通气激发试验(EVH)的支气管收缩反应。连续激发试验对11名已知哮喘患者进行,在两次激发试验前测量的目标分钟通气量为其FEV1的30倍的情况下,均进行6分钟的过度通气。激发试验后FEV1的平均下降幅度在初次EVH激发试验时为(27.4±9.8%),与第二次EVH激发试验的反应(16.1±5.9%)之间存在显著差异(p = 0.0001),表明存在不应性。然后,我们评估了6分钟不间断的EVH激发试验是否会产生与等效(按总分钟通气量计算)的2分钟EVH激发试验重复三次的间断激发试验相似的支气管痉挛反应。对这种间断激发试验的反应中,激发试验后FEV1的平均下降幅度为18.9±10.6%,这与连续6分钟EVH激发试验导致的27.4%的下降幅度有显著差异(p = 0.036)。本研究表明,重复进行EVH激发试验后存在不应期,且这种不应性会影响对间断或定量EVH激发试验的反应。