Shah A B, Hartsell W F, Ghalie R, Kaizer H
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1433-8. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00015-Q.
The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the patterns of failure and the role of local therapy in conjunction with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer.
Between June 1986 and November 1991, 46 patients with hormone unresponsive metastatic or recurrent breast cancer underwent high dose chemotherapy (HDC) with hematopoietic stem cell support. The most commonly used preparative regimen consisted of thiotepa (750 mg/m2), cisplatin (150 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) followed by autologous BMT. Consolidative surgery or irradiation was considered in patients whose cancer responded to BMT and had localized sites of disease.
Six patients (13%) died of BMT-related complications. Of the remaining 40 patients, 22 were candidates for consolidative therapy, and 18 of those patients received consolidative irradiation (17 patients) or surgery (1 patient) to one or more sites. At median follow-up of 27 months (range, 20-78), 12 of 18 (67%) patients have continuous local control at the 22 consolidated sites (1 of 4 controlled at chest wall sites, 7 of 8 at regional nodal sites, 7 of 7 at localized bone sites, and 1 of 3 at lung/mediastinal sites). Toxicity of consolidative irradiation was mainly limited to myelosuppression in 6 of 17 patients. Two patients did not complete the consolidative local therapy, one because of hematologic toxicity and one because of rapid systemic tumor progression during treatment.
In patients with localized areas of extravisceral metastases, consolidative irradiation is feasible with acceptable hematologic toxicity. Consolidative irradiation can result in continuous local control, especially in isolated bone metastases and in regional nodal sites; however, the advantage is less clear in patients undergoing consolidative irradiation for chest wall failures. Because distant visceral metastases still remain a major site of failure after this HDC regimen, a more effective systemic therapy is needed. Consolidative local treatment should be considered in future HDC/BMT protocols for metastatic breast cancer, especially in localized nodal and osseous sites.
本分析旨在评估转移性或复发性乳腺癌的失败模式以及局部治疗联合骨髓移植(BMT)的作用。
1986年6月至1991年11月期间,46例激素无反应性转移性或复发性乳腺癌患者接受了造血干细胞支持下的大剂量化疗(HDC)。最常用的预处理方案包括噻替派(750mg/m²)、顺铂(150mg/m²)和环磷酰胺(120mg/kg),随后进行自体BMT。对癌症对BMT有反应且有局限性疾病部位的患者考虑进行巩固性手术或放疗。
6例患者(13%)死于BMT相关并发症。其余40例患者中,22例适合进行巩固性治疗,其中18例患者接受了一个或多个部位的巩固性放疗(17例患者)或手术(1例患者)。中位随访27个月(范围20 - 78个月),18例患者中有12例(67%)在22个巩固部位实现了持续局部控制(胸壁部位4个中有1个得到控制,区域淋巴结部位8个中有7个,局限性骨部位7个中有7个,肺/纵隔部位3个中有1个)。巩固性放疗的毒性主要局限于17例患者中的6例出现骨髓抑制。2例患者未完成巩固性局部治疗,1例因血液学毒性,1例因治疗期间全身肿瘤快速进展。
对于有局限性内脏外转移灶的患者,巩固性放疗是可行的,血液学毒性可接受。巩固性放疗可实现持续局部控制,尤其是在孤立性骨转移和区域淋巴结部位;然而,对于胸壁失败患者进行巩固性放疗时,其优势不太明显。由于在这种HDC方案后远处内脏转移仍然是主要的失败部位,因此需要更有效的全身治疗。在未来转移性乳腺癌的HDC/BMT方案中应考虑巩固性局部治疗,尤其是在局限性淋巴结和骨部位。