Nakajima S, Roswit W T, Look D C, Holtzman M J
Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Immunol. 1995 Aug 1;155(3):1117-31.
To define the relationship between T cell phenotype and adhesiveness, we examined T cell adhesion to endothelial cell, fibroblast, and epithelial cell monolayers as well as extracellular matrix proteins (collagen and fibronectin) using a three-color flow cytometry-based adherence assay that minimizes basal adhesion levels and facilitates quantitative lymphocyte subtyping. Regardless of monolayer type, monolayer stimulation conditions, or T cell activation status, we found that the gamma delta-TCR-bearing T cells adhered more efficiently than alpha beta T cells. The difference was based predominantly on increased levels of activatable LFA-1 (and to a lesser degree VLA-4) because: 1) it correlated precisely with inhibitability by anti-LFA-1 (and VLA-4) mAbs and the levels of LFA-1 (and VLA-4) on the cell surface, and 2) it persisted after maximal LFA-1 (and VLA-4) activation with phorbol dibutyrate. In contrast to most cases of alpha beta T cell behavior, gamma delta T cell adhesion to cell monolayers was not linked to memory status, i.e., there was no difference between naive V delta 1+ and memory V delta 2+ populations in levels of LFA-1 (or VLA-4) expression or LFA-1- (or VLA-4-) dependent adhesion to cell monolayers. However, V delta 1+ cells exhibited higher levels of VLA-5 that correlated with an increased adhesiveness to fibronectin and to a 120-kDa fibronectin fragment (FN-120) that contains only the VLA-5-binding domain but not to type I collagen or to a fibronectin fragment (FN-40) that binds only VLA-4. Taken together, the results define a hierarchy for integrin (LFA-1, VLA-4, and VLA-5) expression and consequent adhesion among T cell subsets that is linked to TCR gene usage (but not necessarily linked to memory status) and may thereby help to explain the accumulation and retention of V delta 1+ gamma delta T cells in epithelial and connective tissues.
为了确定T细胞表型与黏附性之间的关系,我们使用了基于三色流式细胞术的黏附试验,该试验可将基础黏附水平降至最低并有助于定量淋巴细胞亚群分型,以此来检测T细胞与内皮细胞、成纤维细胞和上皮细胞单层以及细胞外基质蛋白(胶原蛋白和纤连蛋白)的黏附情况。无论单层细胞类型、单层细胞刺激条件或T细胞激活状态如何,我们发现携带γδ-TCR的T细胞比αβ T细胞黏附更有效。这种差异主要基于可激活的LFA-1(以及程度较轻的VLA-4)水平的升高,原因如下:1)它与抗LFA-1(和VLA-4)单克隆抗体的抑制作用以及细胞表面LFA-1(和VLA-4)的水平精确相关;2)在用佛波醇二丁酸酯使LFA-1(和VLA-4)最大程度激活后,这种差异仍然存在。与大多数αβ T细胞行为的情况相反,γδ T细胞与细胞单层的黏附与记忆状态无关,即未活化的Vδ1 +和记忆性Vδ2 +群体在LFA-1(或VLA-4)表达水平或LFA-1-(或VLA-4-)依赖性细胞单层黏附方面没有差异。然而,Vδ1 +细胞表现出更高水平的VLA-5,这与对纤连蛋白和仅包含VLA-5结合域的120 kDa纤连蛋白片段(FN-120)的黏附性增加相关,但与I型胶原蛋白或仅结合VLA-4的纤连蛋白片段(FN-40)无关。综上所述,这些结果确定了整合素(LFA-1、VLA-4和VLA-5)表达以及T细胞亚群间随之而来的黏附的层次结构,这与TCR基因的使用相关(但不一定与记忆状态相关),从而可能有助于解释Vδ1 +γδ T细胞在上皮组织和结缔组织中的积累和滞留。