Oakley A, Fullerton D, Holland J
Social Science Research Unit, University of London, Institute of Education, UK.
AIDS. 1995 May;9(5):479-86.
The aim of this study was to identify and critically review behavioural interventions in the HIV prevention and sexual health fields.
Electronic and hand searches were conducted to retrieve relevant published and unpublished reports of outcome evaluations. A methodological review was carried out to identify those with sufficient methodological strengths to generate reliable conclusions as to effectiveness. Soundly designed studies were defined as those which met the four core criteria of employing control groups, providing pre- and post-intervention data and reporting on all targeted outcomes.
A total of 68 separate reports of outcome evaluations were located. Only 18 were judged to be methodologically adequate. Major problems found were lack of a control group or non-equivalent/unbalanced control groups, small sample sizes, failures to report pre-intervention measures, short follow-up, and high attrition rates. Academic reviewers were more likely than the authors of papers to judge reports of evaluations as providing insufficient information to assess effectiveness.
Evaluation design in this field needs to be improved. Recommendations include more use of randomized controlled trials and the raising of publication standards by journals.
本研究旨在识别并严格审查艾滋病预防和性健康领域的行为干预措施。
通过电子检索和手工检索,获取相关已发表和未发表的结果评估报告。进行了一项方法学综述,以识别那些具有足够方法学优势、能够就有效性得出可靠结论的研究。设计合理的研究被定义为符合以下四个核心标准的研究:采用对照组、提供干预前后的数据以及报告所有目标结果。
共找到68份单独的结果评估报告。只有18份被判定在方法学上是充分的。发现的主要问题包括缺乏对照组或对照组不等效/不均衡、样本量小、未报告干预前的测量数据、随访时间短以及失访率高。学术评审人员比论文作者更有可能判定评估报告提供的信息不足以评估有效性。
该领域的评估设计需要改进。建议包括更多地使用随机对照试验以及提高期刊的发表标准。