• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of review criteria: linking guidelines and assessment of quality.综述标准的制定：将指南与质量评估相联系
BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):370-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.370.
2
Reviewing the value of clinical audit: is now the time for a change?审视临床审计的价值：现在是变革的时候了吗？
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1997;10(2-3):76-9. doi: 10.1108/09526869710166987.
3
Methodological issues in the use of guidelines and audit to improve clinical effectiveness in breast cancer in one United Kingdom health region.英国某一卫生区域内使用指南和审核来提高乳腺癌临床疗效的方法学问题。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Mar;26(2):130-6. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0755.
4
Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: coronary heart disease as a model.基于循证指南制定初级保健评估标准：以冠心病为例
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Sep;53(494):690-6.
5
[Determining priorities in the development of medical guidelines. 1: Criteria, procedures and actors: a methodological review of international experiences].[确定医学指南制定中的优先事项。1：标准、程序与参与者：国际经验的方法学综述]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Jan;94(1):53-60.
6
The use of medical audit for producing guidelines of medical practice.利用医疗审计制定医疗实践指南。
Swiss Surg. 1995(1):29-34.
7
Effective audit in general practice: a method for systematically developing audit protocols containing evidence-based review criteria.全科医疗中的有效审计：一种系统制定包含循证审查标准的审计方案的方法。
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Nov;47(424):743-6.
8
Audit: how to do it in practice.审核：如何在实践中进行
BMJ. 2008 May 31;336(7655):1241-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39527.628322.AD.
9
Identifying priorities for national clinical guidelines.
Nurs Stand. 1999;13(41):37-41. doi: 10.7748/ns1999.06.13.41.37.c2631.
10
External audit of clinical practice and medical decision making in a new Asian oncology center: results and implications for both developing and developed nations.对一家新建亚洲肿瘤中心临床实践与医疗决策的外部审计：对发展中国家和发达国家的结果及启示
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Mar 1;64(3):941-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.027. Epub 2005 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of quality indicators for hypertension, extractable from the electronic health record of the general practitioner: a rand-modified Delphi method.高血压质量指标的开发，可从全科医生的电子健康记录中提取：一项随机修正 Delphi 法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 15;25(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02543-w.
2
Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review.整合指南制定和质量指标发展的方法：系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 16;20(1):875. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05665-w.
3
Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon.黎巴嫩社区药房的良好药房实践评估
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1745. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1745. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
The effect of referral templates on out-patient quality of care in a hospital setting: a cluster randomized controlled trial.转诊模板对医院门诊护理质量的影响：一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 7;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2127-1.
5
Bacterial Contribution in Chronicity of Wounds.细菌在伤口慢性化中的作用
Microb Ecol. 2017 Apr;73(3):710-721. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0867-9. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
6
Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures.基于指南的绩效指标报告标准。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 15;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z.
7
Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach.监测和评估青少年护理质量：采用专家共识法开发一种审核工具。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015 Jul 13;9:28. doi: 10.1186/s13033-015-0019-5. eCollection 2015.
8
Clinical audit, a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology.临床审计——提高医疗质量的宝贵工具：一般方法及在肾脏病学中的应用
World J Nephrol. 2014 Nov 6;3(4):249-55. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.249.
9
Involving patients in quality indicator development - a systematic review.让患者参与质量指标制定——一项系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:259-68. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S39803. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
10
Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review.基于指南的质量指标制定方法——系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-21.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.制定和实施临床实践指南。
Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55-64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55.
2
Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.通过临床指南实现健康收益II：确保指南改变医疗实践。
Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):45-52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.45.
3
Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. I: Developing scientifically valid guidelines.通过临床指南实现健康收益。I：制定科学有效的指南。
Qual Health Care. 1993 Dec;2(4):243-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.243.
4
Problems with implementing guidelines: a randomised controlled trial of consensus management of dyspepsia.实施指南存在的问题：消化不良共识管理的随机对照试验
Qual Health Care. 1993 Dec;2(4):217-21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.217.
5
Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.原发性高血压管理指南：英国高血压学会第二工作组报告
BMJ. 1993 Apr 10;306(6883):983-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6883.983.
6
National asthma attack audit 1991-2. General Practitioners in Asthma Group.1991 - 1992年全国哮喘发作审计。哮喘全科医生小组。
BMJ. 1993 Feb 27;306(6877):559-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6877.559.
7
Checklists for review articles.综述文章的核对清单。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 10;309(6955):648-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6955.648.
8
A method of developing and weighting explicit process of care criteria for quality assessment.一种制定和权衡用于质量评估的明确护理过程标准的方法。
Med Care. 1994 Aug;32(8):755-70. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199408000-00001.
9
Implementing findings of research.实施研究结果。
BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1488.
10
Some observations on attempts to measure appropriateness of care.关于衡量医疗适宜性尝试的一些观察
BMJ. 1994 Sep 17;309(6956):730-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6956.730.

综述标准的制定：将指南与质量评估相联系

Development of review criteria: linking guidelines and assessment of quality.

作者信息

Baker R, Fraser R C

机构信息

Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice, University of Leicester.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):370-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.370.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.7001.370
PMID:7640546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2550434/
Abstract

Review criteria are designed to enable clinicians and others to assess care. However, there is no established method for developing criteria, and they are often confused with guidelines. Criteria should comprise measurable activities that are appropriate for the setting in which they are to be used. They should also be based on research evidence and prioritised according to the strength of that evidence and effect on outcome. Good criteria can be used to aid implementation of guidelines by providing a standard against which to monitor performance and enabling clinical audit.

摘要

评审标准旨在使临床医生和其他人员能够评估医疗服务。然而，目前尚无制定标准的既定方法，而且它们常常与指南相混淆。标准应包括适用于其应用场景的可衡量活动。它们还应以研究证据为基础，并根据该证据的强度和对结果的影响进行优先排序。良好的标准可通过提供一个用以监测绩效的标准并实现临床审计，来帮助指南的实施。