Baker R, Fraser R C
Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice, University of Leicester.
BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):370-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.370.
Review criteria are designed to enable clinicians and others to assess care. However, there is no established method for developing criteria, and they are often confused with guidelines. Criteria should comprise measurable activities that are appropriate for the setting in which they are to be used. They should also be based on research evidence and prioritised according to the strength of that evidence and effect on outcome. Good criteria can be used to aid implementation of guidelines by providing a standard against which to monitor performance and enabling clinical audit.
评审标准旨在使临床医生和其他人员能够评估医疗服务。然而,目前尚无制定标准的既定方法,而且它们常常与指南相混淆。标准应包括适用于其应用场景的可衡量活动。它们还应以研究证据为基础,并根据该证据的强度和对结果的影响进行优先排序。良好的标准可通过提供一个用以监测绩效的标准并实现临床审计,来帮助指南的实施。