Flitcroft D I, Westcott M, Wormald R, Touquet R
Western Eye Hospital, London, UK.
J Accid Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;12(1):23-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.12.1.23.
Emergency care for eye complaints is provided both by accident and emergency (A&E) departments as well as by dedicated eye casualty departments. This study examines the role of each type of department and the quality of eye care provided. Significant differences were found between the accident and emergency department and the eye casualty department in the history, examination and management of eye patients. Most notably, there were significant differences in the quality of the assessment in the two institutions. Overall 19% (19/100) of A&E records had an inadequate history, compared with 2% (1/50) for eye casualty records. Fifty-nine per cent (59/100) of A&E records contained a significant examination omission, compared with only 8% (4/50) of eye casualty records. Most of the omissions related to a failure to perform an adequate, yet simple, ocular examination including failure to record visual acuity. In 44% (44-100) of A&E cases visual acuity was not recorded or recorded incorrectly. In comparison acuity omissions in eye casualty were present in only 4% (2/50) of cases.
急诊部门(A&E)和专门的眼科急诊部门都提供眼部疾病的急诊护理。本研究考察了每种类型部门的作用以及所提供的眼部护理质量。在眼部患者的病史、检查和治疗方面,发现急诊部门和眼科急诊部门之间存在显著差异。最值得注意的是,两个机构在评估质量上存在显著差异。总体而言,19%(19/100)的急诊记录病史不充分,而眼科急诊记录中这一比例为2%(1/50)。59%(59/100)的急诊记录存在重大检查遗漏,而眼科急诊记录中只有8%(4/50)存在此类情况。大多数遗漏与未能进行充分但简单的眼部检查有关,包括未能记录视力。在44%(44/100)的急诊病例中,视力未被记录或记录错误。相比之下,眼科急诊中视力遗漏仅出现在4%(2/50)的病例中。