Hittinger L, Mirsky I, Shen Y T, Patrick T A, Bishop S P, Vatner S F
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass, USA.
Circulation. 1995 Aug 15;92(4):978-86. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.4.978.
Reduced subendocardial coronary reserve is a hallmark of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The goal of this study was to determine whether hemodynamic, as opposed to structural, mechanisms were responsible for the reduced subendocardial coronary reserve.
The effects of near-maximal vasodilation with adenosine were examined in 10 conscious dogs with LVH (79% increase in ratio of LV weight to body weight) induced by aortic banding in puppies with and without preload reduction. At baseline, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV end-diastolic circumferential and compressive radial wall stresses, and LV myocardial blood flow were similar in dogs with LVH and sham-operated controls, while LV end-systolic circumferential wall stress tended to be greater in the LVH group compared with the control group. In control dogs, adenosine reduced LV circumferential end-systolic and end-diastolic wall stresses and compressive radial subendocardial wall stress; LV subendocardial blood flow increased (from 1.41 +/- 0.16 to 3.58 +/- 0.27 mL.min-1.g-1) and the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial blood flow decrease from 1.30 +/- 0.07 to 0.69 +/- 0.05. In dogs with LVH, during adenosine infusion, LV circumferential end-systolic and end-diastolic wall stresses and LV radial subendocardial wall stresses remained elevated, the increase in LV subendocardial blood flow was significantly smaller (from 1.11 +/- 0.11 to 2.27 +/- 0.24 mL.min-1.g-1, P < .05), and the subendocardial/epicardial ratio fell to a lower level (from 1.22 +/- 0.17 to 0.35 +/- 0.03, P < .05). When LV wall stresses during adenosine were reduced in a subgroup of 5 dogs with LVH, the endocardium/epicardium ratio during adenosine infusion was no longer different from that in control dogs (0.63 +/- 0.11), nor was the level of subendocardial blood flow different (3.42 +/- 0.60 mL.min-1.g-1).
These data suggest that hemodynamic factors, eg, compressive forces, are an important component of the reduced subendocardial coronary reserve as opposed to structural alterations, even in the presence of severe LVH.
心内膜下冠状动脉储备减少是左心室肥厚(LVH)的一个标志。本研究的目的是确定与结构机制相对的血流动力学机制是否是心内膜下冠状动脉储备减少的原因。
在10只清醒的LVH犬(幼犬主动脉缩窄诱导,左心室重量与体重比增加79%)中,研究了腺苷近最大程度血管舒张的作用,分为有和没有前负荷降低两组。基线时,LVH犬和假手术对照组的左心室舒张末期压力、左心室舒张末期圆周和压缩径向壁应力以及左心室心肌血流量相似,而LVH组的左心室收缩末期圆周壁应力与对照组相比往往更大。在对照犬中,腺苷降低了左心室圆周收缩末期和舒张末期壁应力以及压缩性心内膜下径向壁应力;左心室心内膜下血流量增加(从1.41±0.16增加到3.58±0.27 mL·min-1·g-1),心内膜下与心外膜下血流量之比从1.30±0.07降至0.69±0.05。在LVH犬中,腺苷输注期间,左心室圆周收缩末期和舒张末期壁应力以及左心室心内膜下径向壁应力仍然升高,左心室心内膜下血流量的增加明显较小(从1.11±0.11增加到2.27±0.24 mL·min-1·g-1,P<0.05),心内膜下/心外膜下比值降至更低水平(从1.22±0.17降至0.35±0.03,P<0.05)。在5只LVH犬的亚组中,当腺苷作用期间左心室壁应力降低时,腺苷输注期间的心内膜/心外膜比值与对照犬不再有差异(0.63±0.11),心内膜下血流量水平也无差异(3.42±0.60 mL·min-1·g-1)。
这些数据表明,血流动力学因素,如压缩力,是心内膜下冠状动脉储备减少的一个重要组成部分,与结构改变无关,即使在严重LVH存在的情况下也是如此。