Tzipori S, Gunzer F, Donnenberg M S, de Montigny L, Kaper J B, Donohue-Rolfe A
Division of Infectious Diseases, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, Massachusetts 01536, USA.
Infect Immun. 1995 Sep;63(9):3621-7. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.9.3621-3627.1995.
We reported previously that mutation of the chromosomal gene eaeA from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) serotype O157:H7 prevented bacterial attachment in vivo. Attachment was restored when the EHEC or enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) eaeA gene was introduced into the mutant on a plasmid. In this communication we have compared in gnotobiotic piglets the pathogenicities of wild-type O157:H7 strain 86-24 and its eaeA mutant UMD619 with those of the two plasmid-complemented strains expressing IntiminO157 (EHEC) and IntiminO127 (EPEC). 86-24 colonized the surface and glandular epithelium of the large intestine and induced diarrhea, while UMD619 did not colonize any intestinal site and induced little or no diarrhea. Surprisingly, strain UMD619 expressing IntiminO127 behaved in pigs more like EPEC than EHEC strains; it colonized the distal half of the small intestine and the surface of the large intestine, inducing serious diarrhea. In contrast, strain UMD619 expressing IntiminO157 colonized the colon extremely poorly, inducing little or no diarrhea. While only the two strains causing extensive attachment--86-24 and UMD619 expressing IntiminO127--induced diarrhea, neurological symptoms attributed to Shiga-like toxin II occurred equally in all four groups of animals. The intimate bacterial attachment and mucosal damage were not a prerequisite for Shiga-like toxin II translocation from the gut lumen into the circulation. IntiminO127 appears not only to facilitate intimate attachment to cells but also to influence the site of intestinal colonization and other characteristics of EPEC infection.
我们之前报道过,肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)O157:H7血清型的染色体基因eaeA发生突变会阻止细菌在体内的附着。当将EHEC或肠致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC)的eaeA基因通过质粒导入该突变体时,附着得以恢复。在本交流中,我们在无菌仔猪中比较了野生型O157:H7菌株86 - 24及其eaeA突变体UMD619与两种表达IntiminO157(EHEC)和IntiminO127(EPEC)的质粒互补菌株的致病性。86 - 24定殖于大肠的表面和腺上皮并引发腹泻,而UMD619未在任何肠道部位定殖,几乎未引发腹泻。令人惊讶的是,表达IntiminO127的UMD619菌株在猪体内的表现更像EPEC而非EHEC菌株;它定殖于小肠后半段和大肠表面,引发严重腹泻。相比之下,表达IntiminO157的UMD619菌株在结肠的定殖极差,几乎未引发腹泻。虽然只有引起广泛附着的两种菌株——86 - 24和表达IntiminO127的UMD619——引发了腹泻,但所有四组动物中由志贺样毒素II引起的神经症状发生率相同。细菌的紧密附着和黏膜损伤并非志贺样毒素II从肠腔转运至循环的先决条件。IntiminO127似乎不仅有助于细菌与细胞的紧密附着,还影响EPEC感染的肠道定殖部位和其他特征。