Mark D B, O'Neill W W, Brodie B, Ivanhoe R, Knopf W, Taylor G, O'Keefe J H, Grines C L, Davidson-Ray L, Knight J D
Economics and Quality of Life Research Group, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Sep;26(3):688-95. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00246-z.
This study sought to describe the economic outcomes from a prospective multicenter registry of primary coronary angioplasty.
Interest in coronary angioplasty without preceding thrombolytic therapy as a primary reperfusion strategy has increased as a result of three recent randomized trials showing outcomes equivalent to or better than standard thrombolytic therapy.
The Primary Angioplasty Registry enrolled 270 patients with acute myocardial infarction at six private tertiary care medical centers. Baseline and follow-up medical costs and counts of resources consumed were collected from enrollment to the 6-month follow-up visit. Correlates and predictors of cost were identified with multivariable linear regression modeling.
Ninety-five percent of patients had a revascularization procedure during the baseline hospital period: 85% had coronary angioplasty only; 4% had coronary bypass surgery only; 6% had both procedures. The total mean baseline hospital cost (not charge) was $13,113, with mean physician fees of $5,694. During the follow-up period, repeat coronary angiography was performed in 21% of patients, whereas 13% had repeat angioplasty and 3% bypass surgery. Mean hospital follow-up costs were $3,174, with mean physician fees of $1,443. Independent correlates of higher baseline hospital costs included older age (p = 0.049), anterior infarction (p = 0.03), initial Killip class (p < 0.0001), more severe coronary disease (p = 0.0015), need for bypass surgery alone or in addition to angioplasty (p < 0.0001) and recurrent ischemia (p < 0.0001).
Costs of primary angioplasty for patients with acute myocardial infarction eligible for thrombolysis were strongly influenced by infarction- and procedure-related complications but only modestly influenced by patient selection factors.
本研究旨在描述一项原发性冠状动脉血管成形术前瞻性多中心注册研究的经济结果。
由于最近三项随机试验表明,无前期溶栓治疗的冠状动脉血管成形术作为主要再灌注策略的结果等同于或优于标准溶栓治疗,因此人们对该治疗的兴趣有所增加。
原发性血管成形术注册研究纳入了6家私立三级医疗中心的270例急性心肌梗死患者。收集从入组到6个月随访期间的基线和随访医疗费用以及消耗的资源数量。通过多变量线性回归模型确定成本的相关因素和预测因素。
95%的患者在基线住院期间接受了血运重建手术:85%仅接受了冠状动脉血管成形术;4%仅接受了冠状动脉搭桥手术;6%接受了两种手术。基线住院总平均费用(非收费)为13,113美元,平均医生费用为5,694美元。在随访期间,21%的患者进行了重复冠状动脉造影,而13%的患者进行了重复血管成形术,3%的患者进行了搭桥手术。平均住院随访费用为3,174美元,平均医生费用为1,443美元。基线住院费用较高的独立相关因素包括年龄较大(p = 0.049)、前壁梗死(p = 0.03)、初始Killip分级(p < 0.0001)、更严重的冠状动脉疾病(p = 0.0015)、单独或除血管成形术外还需要搭桥手术(p < 0.0001)以及复发性缺血(p < 0.0001)。
对于适合溶栓治疗的急性心肌梗死患者,原发性血管成形术的费用受梗死和手术相关并发症的影响较大,但受患者选择因素的影响较小。