Jones C J, Livson N, Peskin H
Department of Psychology, California State University, Fresno 93740-0011, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1995 Aug;65(1):133-45. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6501_10.
Clinician-report California Q-set and self-report California Psychological Inventory data were compared to explore convergence and divergence between these two modes of personality assessment. Based on responses from a sample of 215 approximately 50-year-old men and women, the self-report California Psychological Inventory data were converted to California Q-set item values using previously determined redundancy analysis formulae. These data were then correlated with composite clinicians' ratings, using the same California Q-set items. Substantial convergence was found for both genders on four of six derived components--Empowerment, Intellectuality, Nonconformity, and Outgoingness. Two additional components--Psychological Health and Bodily Concern--showed convergence for women only. We argue analysis of item content and scores must be done for each gender separately.
对临床医生报告的加利福尼亚Q分类法数据和自我报告的加利福尼亚心理调查表数据进行了比较,以探究这两种人格评估方式之间的趋同与差异。基于215名年龄约50岁的男性和女性样本的回答,使用先前确定的冗余分析公式将自我报告的加利福尼亚心理调查表数据转换为加利福尼亚Q分类法项目值。然后使用相同的加利福尼亚Q分类法项目,将这些数据与临床医生的综合评分进行关联。在六个派生成分中的四个——赋权、理智性、不墨守成规和外向性上,发现两性都有显著趋同。另外两个成分——心理健康和身体关注——仅在女性中显示出趋同。我们认为,必须对每个性别的项目内容和分数分别进行分析。