Serruys P W, Herrman J P, Simon R, Rutsch W, Bode C, Laarman G J, van Dijk R, van den Bos A A, Umans V A, Fox K A
Academisch Ziekenhuis Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
N Engl J Med. 1995 Sep 21;333(12):757-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199509213331203.
The likelihood of restenosis is a major limitation of coronary angioplasty. We studied whether hirudin, a highly selective inhibitor of thrombin with irreversible effects, would prevent restenosis after angioplasty. We compared two regimens of recombinant hirudin with heparin.
We randomly assigned 1141 patients with unstable angina who were scheduled for angioplasty to receive one of three treatments: (1) a bolus dose of 10,000 IU of heparin followed by an intravenous infusion of heparin for 24 hours and subcutaneous placebo twice daily for three days (382 patients), (2) a bolus dose of 40 mg of hirudin followed by an intravenous infusion of hirudin for 24 hours and subcutaneous placebo twice daily for three days (381 patients), or (3) the same hirudin regimen except that 40 mg of hirudin was given subcutaneously instead of placebo twice daily for three days (378 patients). The primary end point was event-free survival at seven months. Other end points were early cardiac events (within 96 hours), bleeding and other complications of the study treatment, and angiographic measurements of coronary diameter at six months of follow-up.
At seven months, event-free survival was 67.3 percent in the group receiving heparin, 63.5 percent in the group receiving intravenous hirudin, and 68.0 percent in the group receiving both intravenous and subcutaneous hirudin (P = 0.61). However, the administration of hirudin was associated with a significant reduction in early cardiac events, which occurred in 11.0, 7.9, and 5.6 percent of patients in the respective groups (combined relative risk with hirudin, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.90; P = 0.023). The mean minimal luminal diameters in the respective groups on follow-up angiography at six months were 1.54, 1.47, and 1.56 mm (P = 0.08).
Although significantly fewer early cardiac events occurred with hirudin than with heparin, hirudin had no apparent benefit with longer-term follow-up.
再狭窄的可能性是冠状动脉血管成形术的一个主要限制因素。我们研究了水蛭素(一种对凝血酶具有不可逆作用的高度选择性抑制剂)是否能预防血管成形术后的再狭窄。我们将重组水蛭素的两种给药方案与肝素进行了比较。
我们将1141例计划接受血管成形术的不稳定型心绞痛患者随机分配接受三种治疗之一:(1)静脉推注10000 IU肝素,随后静脉输注肝素24小时,并在三天内每天两次皮下注射安慰剂(382例患者);(2)静脉推注40 mg水蛭素,随后静脉输注水蛭素24小时,并在三天内每天两次皮下注射安慰剂(381例患者);或(3)相同的水蛭素给药方案,但在三天内每天两次皮下注射40 mg水蛭素而非安慰剂(378例患者)。主要终点是七个月时的无事件生存率。其他终点包括早期心脏事件(96小时内)、研究治疗的出血及其他并发症,以及随访六个月时冠状动脉直径的血管造影测量。
七个月时,接受肝素治疗组的无事件生存率为67.3%,接受静脉注射水蛭素组为63.5%,接受静脉和皮下注射水蛭素组为68.0%(P = 0.61)。然而,水蛭素的使用与早期心脏事件显著减少相关,各治疗组中发生早期心脏事件的患者比例分别为11.0%、7.9%和5.6%(水蛭素联合相对风险为0.61;95%置信区间为0.41至0.90;P = 0.023)。六个月时随访血管造影各治疗组的平均最小管腔直径分别为1.54 mm、1.47 mm和1.56 mm(P = 0.08)。
尽管与肝素相比,水蛭素治疗时发生的早期心脏事件明显较少,但在长期随访中水蛭素并无明显益处。