• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效注射技术的比较研究。

A comparative study of depot injection techniques.

作者信息

Quartermaine S, Taylor R

出版信息

Nurs Times. 1995;91(30):36-9.

PMID:7644369
Abstract

Depot injections of long-acting neuroleptic drugs, by maintaining a consistent drug regime, together with regular contact with health-care professionals, are an important factor in helping psychiatric patients who live in the community. As these injections are administered over a long period--often for years--it is important that care is taken to minimise discomfort and to reduce the incidence of problems at the injection site. Seepage of even small amounts of the medication will result in an inaccurate dose being absorbed and, owing to the irritant nature of many of these drugs, leakage into subcutaneous tissue and on to the skin surface can cause pain, irritation and lesions. This study was set up to compare two techniques of administering deep intramuscular injections to determine which best fulfilled the criteria of preventing seepage while causing as little discomfort as possible. The two methods used were the Z-track, which is standard practice in the UK, and the air bubble, which is widely taught and used in Canada and the USA. The study showed the air-bubble method to be significantly more effective at controlling seepage than the Z-track.

摘要

通过维持一致的用药方案以及与医护专业人员定期接触,长效抗精神病药物的长效注射剂是帮助社区精神疾病患者的一个重要因素。由于这些注射剂的使用时间很长——通常长达数年——因此必须注意尽量减少不适,并降低注射部位出现问题的发生率。即使少量药物渗漏也会导致吸收剂量不准确,而且由于许多这类药物具有刺激性,渗漏到皮下组织和皮肤表面会引起疼痛、刺激和损伤。本研究旨在比较两种深部肌内注射技术,以确定哪种技术最能满足防止渗漏且尽量减少不适的标准。所使用的两种方法是英国的标准做法Z形肌内注射法,以及在加拿大和美国广泛教授和使用的气泡法。研究表明,气泡法在控制渗漏方面比Z形肌内注射法显著更有效。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of depot injection techniques.长效注射技术的比较研究。
Nurs Times. 1995;91(30):36-9.
2
A comparison of two depot injection techniques.两种长效注射技术的比较。
Nurs Stand. 1998;12(37):39-41. doi: 10.7748/ns1998.06.12.37.39.c2512.
3
Comparison of intramuscular injection techniques to reduce site discomfort and lesions.比较肌内注射技术以减轻注射部位不适和损伤。
Nurs Res. 1986 Jul-Aug;35(4):207-10.
4
Postbasic nursing procedures. 1. Giving depot neuroleptic drugs.毕业后护理程序。1. 给予长效抗精神病药物。
Nurs Mirror. 1982 Apr 21;154(16):42-3.
5
The subjective experiences of people who regularly receive depot neuroleptic medication in the community.在社区中定期接受长效抗精神病药物治疗的人们的主观体验。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Sep;14(6):578-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01145.x.
6
Long-acting neuroleptics: technique for intramuscular injection.长效抗精神病药物:肌内注射技术
Can Nurse. 1985 Sep;81(8):41-3.
7
[Long-acting injectable risperidone: naturalistic study in three hospitals in Aquitaine].[长效注射用利培酮:阿基坦地区三家医院的自然主义研究]
Encephale. 2007 Dec;33(6):973-81. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.07.003. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
8
Improvements in nursing practice through a study comparing intramuscular depot injection administration techniques.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1997 Dec;4(6):436-7.
9
Clinical review of a long-acting, injectable formulation of risperidone.利培酮长效注射制剂的临床综述
Clin Ther. 2004 Dec;26(12):1994-2002. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.009.
10
Clinical experience with the long-acting injectable formulation of the atypical antipsychotic, risperidone.非典型抗精神病药物利培酮长效注射制剂的临床经验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(4):298-305. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001893.

引用本文的文献

1
Copolymer Composition and Nanoparticle Configuration Enhance in vitro Drug Release Behavior of Poorly Water-soluble Progesterone for Oral Formulations.共聚物组成和纳米粒子结构可增强口服制剂中亲脂性较差的孕激素的体外药物释放行为。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2020 Jul 29;15:5389-5403. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S257353. eCollection 2020.