• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种长效注射技术的比较。

A comparison of two depot injection techniques.

作者信息

Mac Gabhann L

机构信息

Bracton Centre, Specialist Mental Health Service, Oxleas NHS Trust.

出版信息

Nurs Stand. 1998;12(37):39-41. doi: 10.7748/ns1998.06.12.37.39.c2512.

DOI:10.7748/ns1998.06.12.37.39.c2512
PMID:9732632
Abstract

In the study reported in this article, the researchers attempted to raise awareness among practitioners of the importance of intramuscular drug administration technique in reducing injection site complications following antipsychotic depot injections. They also aimed to improve and expand the scope of present practice by comparing the effect of two accepted techniques, the 'air bubble' and 'Z-track' on these complications, and demonstrate that the air bubbles technique is more effective in reducing seepage and causes less discomfort. A 'within subjects' design was used, and Likert scales for scoring subjective and objective assessment of complications were established and scored at each injection. The study showed that there was no significant difference between the effects of either technique.

摘要

在本文所报道的研究中,研究人员试图提高从业者对肌内注射给药技术在减少抗精神病长效注射后注射部位并发症方面重要性的认识。他们还旨在通过比较两种公认技术——“气泡”技术和“Z形轨迹”技术对这些并发症的影响,来改进和扩大当前的实践范围,并证明气泡技术在减少渗漏方面更有效且引起的不适更少。采用了“受试者内”设计,并建立了用于对并发症进行主观和客观评估评分的李克特量表,且在每次注射时进行评分。研究表明,两种技术的效果之间没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
A comparison of two depot injection techniques.两种长效注射技术的比较。
Nurs Stand. 1998;12(37):39-41. doi: 10.7748/ns1998.06.12.37.39.c2512.
2
A comparative study of depot injection techniques.长效注射技术的比较研究。
Nurs Times. 1995;91(30):36-9.
3
Improvements in nursing practice through a study comparing intramuscular depot injection administration techniques.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1997 Dec;4(6):436-7.
4
Does drawing up technique influence patients' perception of pain at the injection site?抽取技术会影响患者对注射部位疼痛的感知吗?
Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs. 2000 Sep;9(3):147-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-0979.2000.00176.x.
5
Comparison of intramuscular injection techniques to reduce site discomfort and lesions.比较肌内注射技术以减轻注射部位不适和损伤。
Nurs Res. 1986 Jul-Aug;35(4):207-10.
6
Injection technique. Depot drugs.注射技术。长效制剂
Nurs Times. 1998;94(47):suppl 1-2.
7
Postbasic nursing procedures. 1. Giving depot neuroleptic drugs.毕业后护理程序。1. 给予长效抗精神病药物。
Nurs Mirror. 1982 Apr 21;154(16):42-3.
8
Injection of depot antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia.在精神分裂症患者中注射长效抗精神病药物。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;63(9):840-1; author reply 841-2. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n0914c.
9
Why change injection sites for depot antipsychotic medication?为什么要更换长效抗精神病药物的注射部位?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;46(8):794. doi: 10.1177/0004867412445024. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
10
[Comparison of two intramuscular injection technics on the severity of discomfort and lesions at the injection site].两种肌肉注射技术在注射部位不适程度和损伤方面的比较
Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 1988 Dec;18(3):257-68. doi: 10.4040/jnas.1988.18.3.257.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychiatric Nurses' Knowledge and Practice Barriers to Administering Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) Antipsychotics in Taiwan: A Mixed-Methods Study.台湾精神科护士在使用长效注射用抗精神病药物方面的知识与实践障碍:一项混合方法研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 6;11(12):1670. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121670.
2
The effect of air-lock technique on pain at the site of intramuscular injection.气锁技术对肌肉注射部位疼痛的影响。
Saudi Med J. 2016 Mar;37(3):304-8. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.3.13113.