Lascault G, Barnay C, Cazeau S, Frank R, Medvedowsky J L
Hôpital Jean-Rostand, Ivry-sur-Seine.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1995 Apr;88(4):451-7.
Pacemakers with diagnostic functions have been implanted for several years. The main clinical indication for these devices is unexplained syncope. Some reports of the use of diagnostic pacemakers have shown that in patients with unexplained syncope, paroxysmal bradycardia was a common finding after implantation. Until recently, diagnostic functions were only available in VVI pacemakers, which explains the limitations of this type of function in determining the mechanism of the bradycardia. The aim of this study was to assess a new dual-chamber diagnostic pacemaker functioning in the VDI mode. Twenty-three patients were implanted with this type of unit and followed up for an average of 153 days. The number of episodes of bradycardia detected was 6 +/- 10 (median: 3). The interval between the installation of the algorithm and the date of the first episode of bradycardia was 67 +/- 86 days (range: 12-306 days). The mechanisms of the bradycardia were atrioventricular block (6 patients), sinus node dysfunction (6 patients) and blocked atrial bigeminy in 1 patient. These conclusions were drawn from analysis of chains of markers. Bradycardia was recorded during the day or during the day and night in 21 patients; bradycardia was exclusively nocturnal in only 2 patients. The tolerance of the algorithm was good on the whole but 3 patients reported minor symptoms related to the relative bradycardia inherent with this type of algorithm. Four other patients had a VDI pacemaker syndrome which was completely corrected by reprogramming the pacemaker to the standard DDD mode. These new devices represent a technical advance in the field of diagnostic pacemakers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
具有诊断功能的起搏器已植入数年。这些装置的主要临床适应症是不明原因的晕厥。一些关于诊断性起搏器使用的报告表明,在不明原因晕厥的患者中,植入后阵发性心动过缓是常见的发现。直到最近,诊断功能仅在VVI起搏器中可用,这解释了这种功能在确定心动过缓机制方面的局限性。本研究的目的是评估一种在VDI模式下工作的新型双腔诊断起搏器。23名患者植入了这种装置,并平均随访了153天。检测到的心动过缓发作次数为6±10次(中位数:3次)。算法安装与首次心动过缓发作日期之间的间隔为67±86天(范围:12 - 306天)。心动过缓的机制为房室传导阻滞(6例患者)、窦房结功能障碍(6例患者)和1例患者的房性早搏二联律受阻。这些结论来自对标记链的分析。21名患者在白天或白天和夜间记录到心动过缓;仅2名患者心动过缓仅在夜间出现。总体而言,该算法的耐受性良好,但3名患者报告了与这种类型算法固有的相对心动过缓相关的轻微症状。另外4名患者有VDI起搏器综合征,通过将起搏器重新编程为标准DDD模式完全得到纠正。这些新装置代表了诊断性起搏器领域的一项技术进步。(摘要截断于250字)